Garmin Vivoactive 5 review: Should you buy it?

Update, February 2024: Added minor updates to the capabilities of some Garmin Vivoactive 5 alternatives.

Should you buy the Garmin Vivoactive 5?

For years, Garmin’s Vivoactive series ran the table in popularity, offering a balanced blend of smart features and wellness-tracking tools. That is until the Venu series arrived. With its colorful displays and boosted smart features, the Venu lineup seemed to replace the Vivoactive line, and in fact, we didn’t see an upgrade to the latter for roughly four years. Finally, the Vivoactive 5 landed with an AMOLED display of its own and a trove of software updates. Approachably priced at $299, the device situates itself neatly between Garmin’s square-shaped Venu Sq 2 and the Venu 3.

The Vivoactive 5 comes in a single 42mm case size with a 1.2-inch touchscreen that’s no longer an outdated MIP display. Instead, it features a 390 x 390 resolution AMOLED display covered in Gorilla Glass and surrounded by an aluminum bezel. The screen is nearly identical to the Venu 3S, though the overall impression of the device is more casual.

Given that the Vivoactive 5 only features two buttons, I relied on the touchscreen more heavily than I tend to on most three or five-button Garmin watches. Overall, the display is responsive and reliable, though, like many watches, it struggles with wet or sweaty hands. Fortunately, the watch also features a revamped interface, with organized app/activity menus, a Recents menu, and expanded shortcuts, so navigation is fairly streamlined.

Turned over, the Vivoactive 5 reveals another significant upgrade compared to the Vivoactive 4, though not as impressive as I expected. Where the previous generation featured a third-generation Elevate heart rate sensor, the newer device features a Gen 4. This is an improvement, but it’s not Garmin’s newest Gen 5 sensor, as seen on the Venu 3. That means the Vivoactive 5 will not be eligible for an ECG app down the line. The Venu 3 meanwhile has received FDA approval to feature Garmin’s ECG app.

Instead, the watch leverages its sensor for activity tracking and overnight stats. The Vivoactive 5 is the second Garmin watch to offer automatic nap detection as well as on-device sleep coaching and sleep recommendation factors, all of which work as well as they did during my Venu 3 testing.

These tools and their corresponding stats are used to calculate useful metrics like Body Battery. Considering the device also now features heart rate variability tracking (HRV), it’s easy to dub the watch a more robust training companion than the Vivoactive 4.

Other tools added to the line are Garmin’s Morning Report and Daily Summary, which condense users’ key metrics for quick consumption (one in the morning and the other before bed). I love waking up to a friendly, wrist-based greeting. Garmin also added Recovery Time and Workout Benefit and the ability to add on-watch interval workouts and several new sport profiles, including wheelchair-specific ones. The line still doesn’t offer the company’s highest-end fitness tracking features, like Training Readiness, but it packs an impressive toolkit for active shoppers at this price point.

Digging in deeper, I found a few more additions and some omissions. For cyclists, the device adds eBike sensor support. However, it doesn’t see cycling power meter support like the Venu 3. Likewise, you can configure interval workouts on-device and customize activity data pages, but the device no longer shows animated workout guidance like its predecessor. Instead, workouts like strength training now display illustrations that highlight which muscles a workout will challenge. Finally, the device drops the 4’s barometric altimeter, eliminating stairs climbed and elevation tracking.

Fortunately, what the Vivoactive 5 does track it does so very well. Throughout my tests, the Vivoactive 5’s GPS data closely matched that of the more expensive Venu 3. You can see how the routes are largely consistent on the neighborhood run above. Both recorded routes on the correct side of the road, and neither dipped into lawns. One exception is on Megan Ct in the top right corner. Here, both devices took a wider turn than I ran in reality.

Likewise, the Vivoactive 5 recorded reliable heart rate data as well. The graph above shows the Vivoactive 5 relatively aligned with my Venu 3 during a run with intermittent sprints. Both devices were within two or three beats of my Polar H10 strap. Generally speaking, the Vivoactive 5’s heart rate sensor is great. It may not be as exact as Garmin’s high-end watches, but it’s more than adequate for the average, active user.

Finally, despite its vibrant display, the Vivoactive 5 claims 11 days of battery life in default mode and five days in always-on mode. These estimates lined up with my experience during this review. After three days with 60 or so minutes of GPS workouts per day, the device had just under 30% left. Compared to the Apple Watch on my other wrist, that’s a fantastic stat.

Of course, compared to Apple’s devices and the Venu 3, the Vivoactive does not have as much all-day functionality in terms of smart features. Users won’t find on-wrist phone calls or voice assistant support. The Vivoactive 5 does, however, provide music storage, smartphone notifications, Garmin Pay, and an on-screen flashlight.

What are the best Garmin Vivoactive 5 alternatives?

Teetering between a budget-friendly device and a full-blown smartwatch, the Vivoactive 5 faces a lot of competition. Below are the best Vivoactive 5 alternatives.

• Garmin Venu Sq 2 ($249.99 at Amazon): For anyone on a strict budget, Garmin’s square-shaped smartwatch lands at $50 lower than the Vivoactive 5. The device offers 24-hour heart rate monitoring, 25 sport modes, SpO2 tracking, and more.
• Garmin Venu 3 ($449.99 at Amazon): Priced significantly higher, the Venu 3 is the best smartwatch Garmin has to offer. Unlike the Vivoactive 5, it features on-wrist phone call and voice assistant support for a more well-rounded experience, plus an ECG app.
• Apple Watch SE 2 ($269.99 at Amazon): Apple’s budget-friendly model is the best Vivoactive 5 alternative for iOS users. The SE 2 drops a few health sensors in favor of a lower price tag.
• Apple Watch Series 9 ($392.67 at Amazon): For the best Apple Watch experience available, the Series 9 is the newest model featuring a powerful processor, updated watchOS software, and a pink case color.
• Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 ($299.99 at Samsung): The best Wear OS smartwatch for Android users is the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 or 6 Classic. Both devices offer similar experiences, but the Classic model features a rotating bezel for easier on-device navigation. The Galaxy Watch is also now FDA approved for monitoring signs of sleep apnea.

Garmin Vivoactive 5 specs

Garmin Vivoactive 5 review: FAQ