Garmin Venu Sq review: What the Venu should've been all along

It’s not often that Garmin releases a product one could describe as “cheap.” No matter the product category — running watches, smartwatches, or even basic fitness trackers — Garmin’s wearables usually come with a premium price tag. That was certainly the case for 2019’s Venu smartwatch, the company’s first OLED-touting watch meant to appeal to a wider audience. But at $400, it was hardly interested price-conscious buyers. Subsequent Venu 2 models haven’t solved this problem either.

To win over that crowd, Garmin launched a new smartwatch called the Garmin Venu Sq. It takes everything we liked about the Garmin Venu, swaps out the circular OLED screen for a rectangular LCD, removes a few sensors, and cuts the price in half. This is what Garmin should’ve been doing all along with the Venu line. Read our Garmin Venu Sq review to learn why.

Update, March 2023: We’ve updated our Garmin Venu Sq review with the latest pricing details, and more.

What you need to know about the Garmin Venu Sq

The Garmin Venu was a staple at the top of our best fitness watches list after its release though it has since been replaced by the Venu Sq 2, which features impressive battery life, accurate heart rate tracking, and a handy Health Snapshot feature. One of the only major downsides of the first-gen Venu Sq was its $400 starting price, which we felt was too steep. Presumably, many others also thought it was too expensive because the company is launching a cheaper version of the watch called the Garmin Venu Sq. (The “Sq” likely stands for “square.”)

The Garmin Venu Sq was a necessary launch for Garmin. The company has dabbled in the low-cost running watch market with the Forerunner 35/45 series but neglected the more general outdoor enthusiast crowd. That’s where the Venu and Vivoactive 4/4S would come in, but those devices are too expensive. The Venu Sq provides all the important features from those devices at a much lower starting price.

Garmin Venu Sq vs Garmin Venu: What’s different?

Despite the $150 price difference, there aren’t too many things that separate the Garmin Venu Sq from the Venu. So, let’s start with the differences.

• Display: The Garmin Venu Sq has a 1.3-inch rectangular LCD display with Corning Gorilla Glass 3. The Garmin Venu has the same Gorilla Glass covering but comes with a sleeker 1.2-inch circular AMOLED display. Despite the technically bigger display on the Venu Sq, it feels notably smaller than the Venu’s display. Menus feel cramped, and I frequently mistap items. You’ll definitely notice a difference in display tech, too. Blacks aren’t as deep as they are on the Venu’s AMOLED panel. Viewing angles are good, but the screen looks washed out.
• Build quality: It feels like Garmin cut some corners in build quality compared to the Venu. The Sq’s plastic case feels light and almost toy-like. It reminds me of an Amazfit wearable. The strap is fine — not as rubbery as the Venu’s, and the buckle is plastic. The Venu is made of similar materials but feels much more premium.
• Music support: The $199 Garmin Venu Sq does not come with music support. You’ll need to pay extra for the Venu Sq Music Edition, which comes with enough storage for about 500 songs. It supports Spotify, Amazon Prime Music, Deezer, and local music files. By contrast, all other Garmin Venu models come with music support.
• Battery life: The Garmin Venu Sq is advertised to last six days on a single charge in smartwatch mode and 14 hours with the GPS running. That’s a decent increase over the Garmin Venu’s five days in smartwatch mode.
• Missing sensors: The Garmin Venu Sq does not have an altimeter for measuring elevation or a gyroscope for angular velocity.
• Wi-Fi: The Garmin Venu Sq Music Edition has Wi-Fi support for syncing music files, but the standard Venu Sq does not. You’ll need to rely on a Bluetooth connection for data uploads.

If you can believe it, those are the only notable differences between the two. Here’s an overview of the similarities between the Garmin Venu Sq and the original Venu:

• Onboard GPS and Garmin Elevate heart rate sensors (same sensor models as the Garmin Venu)
• Over 20 built-in sport modes for indoor and outdoor exercises
• Tracks steps, intensity minutes, calories burned, and more
• Advanced sleep tracking for light, deep, and REM sleep stages
• Preloaded workouts built into the watch (not animated like on the Venu)
• Garmin Coach support
• Garmin Pay support on all models
• Pulse oximeter for measuring blood oxygen saturation (spot-check, during sleep, and optionally all-day)
• Fitness age, VO2 max, Body Battery
• Respiration tracking, abnormally high/low heart rate notifications
• All-day stress and hydration tracking
• Relaxation breathing timer and relaxation reminders
• Menstrual cycle tracking

Garmin Venu Sq specs

How does the Garmin Venu Sq perform?

Considering the similar specs and features, the Garmin Venu Sq unsurprisingly performs just about as well as the Garmin Venu.

The new square LCD display is okay, not great. It’s not as contrasty or vibrant as the Garmin Venu’s OLED panel, but it’s fine if you’re not comparing the two side by side. It gets bright enough to see in direct sunlight, at least.

The Garmin Venu Sq uses the same Garmin Elevate optical heart rate sensor and GPS as the original Venu. Thus, accuracy and performance are just about the same. Let’s take a look at the Venu Sq’s heart rate data compared to the Fitbit Sense and Wahoo Tickr X chest strap.

This was a 5.5-mile interval run around my local park. The Venu Sq reported all-around more accurate numbers than the Fitbit Sense. All three devices picked up my first walk at around 15 minutes. Problems arose at 19:30, where the Tickr X reported a low ~85bpm while the other two devices only got down to 110bpm. Despite not hitting the mark, the Venu Sq’s readings at that time were much more stable than the Fitbit Sense’s numbers — I’m not sure what exactly happened there with the Sense.

The Venu Sq experienced a few hiccups here and there throughout the run but managed to keep up for the most part. It nearly stayed with the chest strap at 24:30, and hit the valleys at 30 minutes and 34 minutes. I’m impressed with the Venu Sq’s performance here. I think its heart rate sensor will more than suffice for most people.

Overall distance metrics were not really affected. It reported a total mileage of 5.5 miles compared to the Sense’s 5.46 miles. That will no doubt be good enough for most people.

As mentioned, the Venu Sq does not have a barometric altimeter or a gyroscope. This makes elevation data more of an estimate than an actual tracked metric like you have on the Venu. I suppose some corners needed to be cut to reach the low $200 price tag.

The Garmin Venu Sq also has a pulse oximeter that can keep track of your blood oxygen saturation all day, during sleep, or on-demand throughout the day. You can also turn it off. Keeping it on all day will greatly reduce battery life, but it will actually measure throughout the whole day, not sporadically like the Garmin vivosmart 4.

For the Garmin Venu Sq review period, I had it record mostly at night with a few spot-checks during the day. My SpO2 numbers hovered around 94-95% at night, which was about a percentage point below what the Fitbit Sense reported. It was pretty much the same for readings during the day.

The Venu Sq will also track your sleep stages, including light, deep, and REM sleep. Garmin Connect clearly displays this information in an easy-to-read graph. Along with stages, the graph can display your movement, pulse ox data, or respiration rate throughout the night.

Sleep tracking performance was in line with the results I got from the Fitbit Sense and Withings ScanWatch. I like that Garmin Connect shows your daily and weekly sleep averages, but I would like to see more from Garmin here. There are no insights to be found on how to improve your overall sleep or why REM/deep sleep is so important. You can see how your sleep numbers compare with other Garmin users, but there is limited info on what it means or what you might want to improve.

Garmin has a version of the Venu Sq with offline music support. Spotify, Amazon Prime Music, Deezer, and local files are all supported. That’s great for those who want access to phone-free music, but the company shouldn’t charge $50 extra for it. It’s really the only difference between the two Sq models, making this an obvious cash grab on Garmin’s part. It’s 2021, and all smartwatches should have offline music support.

One benefit you get with the Venu Sq over the original Venu is improved battery life. Garmin advertises ~six-day battery life on the Venu Sq in “smartwatch mode,” which means using the watch normally. My usage put me at around five days of battery life. I used the watch for smartphone notifications, four tracked exercises with GPS, sleep tracking, pulse ox only for sleep, and with the always-on display turned on. Turning the always-on display off will likely get you to that six-day mark.

For information on design and build quality, preloaded workouts, respiration and stress tracking, fitness age, VO2 max, and Body Battery features, head over to our Garmin Venu review and Garmin Venu 2 review. You’ll find more about the Garmin Connect app, in our dedicated guide and our Fitbit vs Garmin comparison.

Garmin Venu Sq review: Price and competition

The Garmin Venu Sq and Venu Sq Music Edition are on sale now on Garmin.com and other retailers. The Venu Sq launched at $199.99 and comes in Orchid/Metallic Orchid, White/Light Gold, and Shadow Gray/Slate colorways. The Venu Sq Music Edition debuted at $249.99 and comes in Light Sand/Rose Gold, Navy/Light Gold, Moss/Slate, and Black/Slate colorways. The Venu Sq is also available in India for Rs 17,990 (~$237).

$200 is a fantastic price for the Garmin Venu Sq, but it regularly drops below that price point further sweetening the deal. This is a solid outdoor GPS watch that challenges the older and cheaper Fitbit Versa 2 ($113.99 at Fitbit) and even the more impressive Fitbit Versa 3 ($158 at Amazon). The Venu Sq gives you better specs and less janky software for a similar price.

Adding meat to the argument is the Garmin Venu Sq Music’s regular price drops. If tunes are important to you, this model has dipped below the $200 mark on retailers like Amazon. Though, the Versa 2 and Versa 3 do offer offline music support, too.

If you’re in need of a better smartwatch at this price point, I’d suggest checking out the Apple Watch SE (2022) ($269.99 at Amazon). It has far more smart features along with a solid fitness tracking package. It’s also competitively priced.

Of course, the Garmin Venu Sq 2 ($249.99 at Amazon) is now also in play. It brings with it an OLED display, a handy Health Snapshot feature, and a sleeker design. However, you won’t find anything revolutionary here. And those pining for a simple, budget running watch may still find mountains of value in the original Venu Sq.

Further reading: The best fitness tracker deals we could find

Garmin Venu Sq review: The verdict

I’ve used the Garmin Venu on and off for the past year. After using the Venu Sq for just a few days, I can already say this is what the Garmin Venu should’ve been all along. To me, $400 was an unfair price for the Venu, especially because its headline feature (the OLED display) wasn’t really utilized to its full potential. Take away that OLED screen and you’re not really missing out on much.

The Garmin Venu Sq is a well-rounded entry-level GPS watch that will definitely appeal to a lot of first-time Garmin buyers. The Venu Sq Music Edition is an even more well-rounded device, though I wish Garmin stopped charging extra for something we should have on every outdoor watch. That, and I do think some people will dislike the cramped display. Fiddling around with a small touchscreen on a run isn’t exactly fun.

If those are the worst things about the Garmin Venu Sq, I think Garmin did a great job with its first cheap GPS watch in years.