LG is proud of its newest flagship device, but is it worth all the praise that people have been giving it? Should we judge the LG Optimus G F180K by its specs? Of course not.
We put this beast through a series of benchmark tests to see how it fares against one of the major players in the high-end smartphone arena, the Samsung Galaxy S3 GT-I9300. How does the Optimus G stack up against one of the reigning Android smartphone kings?
Let’s find out by putting both processors through a battery of benchmark tests. (You may also skip forward to this article’s video version.)
The Samsung Galaxy S3 is equipped with the Samsung Exynos 4412 processor, which consists of a 1.4 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 CPU and ARM Mali-400 MP4 GPU.
The LG Optimus G, on the other hand, has a Snapdragon S4 Pro chipset that packs a 1.5 GHz quad-core Krait CPU and Adreno 320 GPU.
Both of these systems were put to the test in a series of benchmark tests.
The first set is comprised of benchmarks that measure overall performance, such as the CPU, 2D and 3D display, and SD card reading speed. The second set measures the CPU processing power of both processors. This set also measures how fast a processor can compute a simple engineering equation. The third set measures the GPU of both processors. Lastly, the final set measures web browser performance.
Although these benchmarks results may give you a final score for processor performance, the results are still not 100% accurate and may vary from time to time. All the results here are purely estimated. It is impossible to produce a single number that will give a 100% accurate result from each benchmark test.
To ensure the integrity of benchmark results, both phones were wiped clean, were running the stock ROMs that they came out of the box with, and were running the default settings/configurations. No extra apps were installed; only the required benchmark apps were installed on both phones. All battery saving options that limited or boosted the performance of the phones were also turned off.
Quadrant scores had the Snapdragon S4 Pro leading the Exynos 4412 by 781 points. This suggests that the Qualcomm chip has better overall performance, according to the Quadrant benchmark.
AnTuTu Benchmark has a similar finding: the Snapdragon chipset is snappier.
Even CF-Bench concurs: the Snapdragon indeed has better overall performance than the Exynos.
LG Optimus G’s Snapdragon S4 Pro processor clearly wins this round. Samsung’s Exynos 4412 did well, too, with only about 1,000 points behind LG’s score. But, as has been said earlier, these results should be taken with a grain of salt.
Here, we measure the the performance of the CPU subsystem of both processors. Geekbench 2 and Vellamo Mobile Benchmark Metal focus more on CPU and memory performance. Linpack for Android measures how fast a CPU computes a system of linear equations.
The Snapdragon S4 Pro processor got higher scores in Geekbench 2, Linpack for Android Single Thread, and Linpack for Android Muti-thread. In Vellamo Mobile Benchmark Metal, it was a close fight between the two, with Samsung’s Exynos 4412 processor scoring 15 points higher than Qualcomm’s.
For hardcore gamers, you will be pleased with the performance of both these processors. The Snapdragon S4 Pro processor did very well in the GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt HD C24Z16 Onscreen and Offscreen tests. Although the Exynos 4412 scored lower in these tests, it did maintain its 15 fps score in both Onscreen and Offscreen tests.
NenaMark 1 and NenaMark 2 also yielded the same results with only a 0.1 fps difference in the Exynos’ Nenamark 2 score.
The Snapdragon S4 Pro processor also scored higher in the An3DBench XL benchmark.
If you want to see these benchmarks in action, check out our YouTube video below:
Qualcomm did a good job in creating a fiery beast. Based on the benchmark test results, the Snapdragon S4 Pro blew its fiery flames on Samsung’s Exynos 4412. The Snapdragon S4 Pro did pretty well in overall processor performance and CPU computing speed.
The Samsung Exynos 4412 also did very well during the benchmark test. The processor did yield good scores and came very close to topping Qualcomm’s scores. The Exynos 4412, however, did exceptionally well during in browser benchmark test.
Both processors got nearly even scores in the graphics benchmark tests.
As mentioned earlier, these benchmarks are just an estimation and cannot accurately measure the performance of a device.
Which phone and processor is the king of your hill? Is it the fiery Snapdragon S4 Pro or the nearly-as-fiery Samsung Exynos 4412 processor? Share your thoughts by voting in the poll and sounding off in the comments.
(with contributions from Alvin Ybañez and Dan Evans)
In the case of Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 4412, whose side are you on?
Like this post? Share it!
LOL i expected more. this shit is rubbish lol s4 pro sucks if it only manages to just beat out exynos 4412
so how is it shit?
next gen QUADCORE s4 pro a15 1.5ghz cpu JUST beats out a older cpu. FAIL
was both them running ics or was s3 running jb because optimus g only runs on ics
Which makes the results still somewhat a tad more interesting on that factor no?
you should have used the padfone 2, because the software is way better on this.
LG screwed it up – the antutu score should be more like 13-16000, the quadrant should be around 7000-7500!
conclusion: this benchmark test is incorrect!
the s4 pro is (much) faster than you can conclude from this test.
just repeat it with nexus 4 or padfone 2 and you’ll find that im right.
btw: the s3 quadcore should score 12000 in antutu – even with apps in the background (i own a s3).
Agreed.. i thought i saw the S4 Pro destroy the Note 2′s overclocked Exynos in tests.. How is that possible if it barely beat this one.. but then again its only an estimate.
here is proof that the s4 pro is much better than you’d expect from this test
theres more benchmarks like this on youtube, look around :)
Let exynos 5 come…then it will be a fair comparison.
Not really… S4′s design aren’t exactly A9 but it’s not A15 either. Almost.
Actually i am new to android..so consider me a layman
But on every website it is stated to be based on A15 architecture
Thats y i said A15 vs A15 will be a fair comparison.
But of course it will be better than A9 since it’s newer. It would be a fair comparison since Krait is somehow based off A15, albeit a less superior one.
another thing that bugs me about this test:
the browsermark! if you want to test the processing power – use the same browser (chrome or dolphin are the fastest!).
that 80.000 score is just ridiculous because its obviously the browsers fault (just do browsermark on opera mobile & then on dolphin! dolphin is almost twice as fast on my phone. firefox is pretty slow too!)
Nothing compared to Exynos 5:
YOU DON’T SAY!
Did you actually read that article ?
The Exynos 5 draws 4 watts under load !!!
i want to see the quadcore S4 Pro vs the dualcore Exynos 5250 benchmarks. i wonder when the tegra 4 is coming out?!?!
tegra chips are the weakest of all mobile CPU’s
any chance of a Optimus G Vs Nexus 4 test? or did i miss it?
i’d like to see the US variant of S3 vs the LG opt G processors :D or the result from the opt G is the same with the US S3
What about a power bench mark? What good is a performance benchmark without context?
You can’t compare a Krait cpu, which is similar to A15, with a cortex A9…
we definitely need a comparison of the LG and the Galaxy Note 2 and I bet we see the LG get trounced. – KID ANDROID. ( Team.Android.Canada)
These benchmarks mean nothing. The better smartphone is the Galaxy S3.
In terms of price per performance, the Exynos 4412 makes more sense.