xiaomi mi4 first impressions aa (1 of 13)

I’m sure you’ve heard by now, Xiaomi is proving to be a rather successful business in China and is eyeing further expansion over the next 12 months. The reason for the company’s consumer appeal is simple; its low cost, high-end devices offer better value for money that its competitors. We know that Xiaomi is already profitable, so just how is the company able to offer high-end smartphones and complementary products for so cheap?

The first noticeable difference between Xiaomi and traditional OEMs is that the Chinese upstart completely cuts out all of the middle-men. By offering its product solely though its own website, Xiaomi removes the mark-ups applied by third party retailers. Xiaomi also spends very little on advertising, compared with its rivals, and instead relies on word of mouth, pricing, sales, and the unique position of its brand to attract consumers. Although this is clearly a luxury that not every smartphone brand is fortunate enough to enjoy.

Xiaomi Redmi Note

Xiaomi’s Redmi Note has repeatedly sold out during the company’s flash sales.

Furthermore, by keeping tight control over its stock, Xiaomi can place cheaper batch orders as demand dictates. Limited availability flash sales ensure that supply never outstrips demand and helps create a free marketing buzz around its products. Traditional OEMs have to incur large upfront productions costs in order to ship smartphones out to retailers all around the world, some of which many not sell. This is far more expensive that Xiaomi’s model and it’s consumers that end up paying the difference.

Limited availability flash sales ensure that supply never outstrips demand

This model is beneficial to consumers in more than one way. Not only are products cheaper to purchase, as Xiaomi isn’t incurring any additional costs, but purchasing devices straight from the manufacturer is also likely to leave customers feeling more secure in their purchase. If consumers are happy with their products, Xiaomi has a line-up of complementary electronics goods and accessories that are likely to please and result in repeat business. Everyone is happy.

This model has proven so successful at appealing to upfront cost oriented consumers this year that Samsung, and some of the other established OEMs, have seen sales suffer and have lost market share to the low-cost upstart brand. Several of Xiaomi’s regional competitors have caught wind of this successful formula and have recently begun adopting similar strategies.

oneplus one aa (23 of 34)

OnePlus’ invite system may not be as well received as Xiaomi’s flash sales, but both allow the companies to keep close control of stock at minimal expense.

OnePlus is probably the most well-known OEM with a similar on-line oriented business model. The controversial invite system allows the company to control stock levels efficiently, creates an aura of exclusivity, and keeps costs low while the company is in its infancy. Huawei’s Honor 6 and 3C are also being sold directly to consumers through online sales channels. Both of these companies sell handsets for substantially less than traditional brands.

MicroMax’s newly announced Yureka smartphone is a direct response to Xiaomi’s intentions in India

Meizu, another Chinese electronics company, is set to launch a spin-off “Blue Charm” brand, which will offer low cost smartphones, wearables, TVs and routers, similar to Xiaomi’s extended product range. The first handset in this new range should arrive by the end of the year and is again targeted at those interested in value for money.

Lenovo is also planning its own online only brand of smartphones, which is expected to launch in April 2015. Lenovo’s brand will be named “Fancy Maker”, oddly enough, although exact details of this project have not been announced yet.

micromax yu yureka

Micromax’s Yureka features low-cost hardware and CyanogenMod out of the box for less than $150.

Most recently, MicroMax’s newly announced Yureka smartphone is a direct response to Xiaomi’s intentions in India. The handset will be made exclusively through Amazon in India and will retail for just Rs.8,999 ($142). The Cyanogen fiasco associated with the handset’s launch goes to show just how tough competition is in the region and how manufacturers need to make their products stand out.

Xiaomi, and the other low-cost Android manufacturers, represent a big change in the way that that many OEMs will do business in the future. Whether or not Samsung, and the other established brands, will eventually need to match this new business method remains to be seen, but it is likely that changes will be required if the big OEMs want to keep their foot in the door of growing markets like India. It is certainly possible that other manufacturers could start offering smartphones for lower prices through their own e-commerce stores, at least in regions where this business model is already proving successful.

Over the next year, competition in Asia and India is likely to become even fiercer, as smaller brands race to offer low-cost, value for money smartphones to the next billion consumers.