Qualcomm Quick Charge vs Oppo VOOC vs MediaTek PumpExpress+ vs Motorola TurboPower vs the others (updated)

by: Gary SimsFebruary 4, 2016
1.1K

Update: Added section “Charging while watching a video” to compare Oppo VOOC and Samsung Adaptive Fast Charging while streaming video over Wi-Fi.

When it comes to naming fast charging systems it seems that the marketing departments of the world’s smartphone makers have all been thumbing through a thesaurus to find suitable terms. Among the various names used are “fast”, “quick”, “rapid”, and “turbo.” There are a few fast charging systems with more exotic names including VOOC Flash charging and PumpExpress+. If you work for a marketing department then just let me tell you that “brisk”, “warp” and “lickety-split” are still free!

So what does all these names mean and which one is the best? To answer those questions I tested several different fast charging systems from the world’s leading OEMs to see which ones really live up to their monikers!

The first stage can be performed with a high amount of power and takes the battery up to around 80%.

Probably the best known fast charging system is Qualcomm’s Quick Charge (QC), versions 2.0 and 3.0. However it isn’t the only fast charging system. Samsung also has one called “Adaptive Fast Charging” and it is basically a re-brand of Qualcomm’s technology, as it seems from my testing to be fully compatible with QC 2.0. Motorola has its TurboPower system (which is probably also a rebrand of QC 2.0), while Oppo has VOOC Flash charging. Probably the least well known system is PumpExpress+ from MediaTek. It is also worth mentioning Huawei’s SmartPower fast charging tech that is in the Mate 8. One of the claims that Huawei make about the Mate 8 is that you can get a full day’s use out of a 30 minute charge.

How does it all work?

The basic principle of charging systems is simple. There is a re-chargeable battery which delivers energy to a smartphone over time. When the battery is depleted it needs to be re-charged. To do this the smartphone is connected to a charger. The charger puts energy back into the battery. The rate at which that energy is supplied to the battery is measured in watts. The more watts, the more power. The higher the power the quicker the battery can charge. Simple!

There is one other twist to this tale. Smartphone batteries are charged in two stages. The first stage can be performed with a high amount of power and takes the battery up to around 80%. Then the second stage kicks in where the power is reduced as the battery is topped up to full. This is why smartphone makers talk about how quickly the phone can be charged to 80%, or that just 30 minutes of charge will be enough for another 8 hours of usage, etc. This is because they are talking about charging in stage 1, up to the 80% level. Sometimes the last 20% can be as much as 50% of the total charging time, but we will look at that in more detail later on.

QC-vs-VOOC-vs-others-charging-phases-3

One final thing. Power is measured in watts and we calculate watts by multiplying the current (measured in amps) by the voltage (measured in volts). This means when you look at the small print on a charger you will see a line that says something like: “5V – 2A or 9V – 2A”. The line is actually the symbol for direct current (DC).

A normal USB 2.0 port works at 5V and 0.5A which is 2.5W. A charger running at 5V and 2A generates 10W, a fast charger using 9V and 1.67A creates 15W, and so on. Therefore the key to understanding fast charging is to see how many watts are produced by the charger, in terms of its voltage and current output, during the different charging stages.

Charging TechnologyUSB 2.0 portTypical Modern AdaptorQualcomm Quick Charge 2.0Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0Oppo VOOC Flash ChargeMediaTek PumpExpress+Motorola TurboPowerSamsung Adaptive Fast ChargerHuawei SmartPower
Voltage5V5V5V / 9V / 12V3.2v - 20v dynamic5V5V / 9V5V / 9V5V / 9V5V / 9V
Current0.5A2A3A / 1.67A / 1.25A5A4A2A1.2A / 1.67A2A / 1.67A2A
Power2.5W10W36W (for 12V)36W (for 12V)20W18W15W15W18W

From a specifications point of view, Quick Charge 2.0 and 3.0 offer the highest theoretical power output, however the actual levels are limited by the connectors. At the time of writing there are Quick Charge power accessories on the market that support 20W and 25W.

The phones

To test the different charging technologies I am using the following phones:

  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4 (QC 2.0)
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 5 (Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge)
  • Moto X Force (TurboPower)
  • Oppo R7s (VOOC)
  • Vivo X6D (PumpExpress+ which the X6D calls “dual-engine quick charging”)
  • Huawei Mate 8 (Huawei SmartPower)
 Charging SystemBattery SizeSoC
Samsung Galaxy Note 4QC 2.03220 mAhQualcomm Snapdragon 805
Samsung Galaxy Note 5Samsung Adaptive Fast Charging3000 mAhSamsung Exynos 7420
Oppo R7sVOOC Flash Charging3070 mAhQualcomm Snapdragon 615
Vivo X6DMediaTek PumpExpress+2400 mAhMediaTek MT6752
Moto X ForceMotorola TurboPower3760 mAhQualcomm Snapdragon 810
Huawei Mate 8Huawei SmartPower4000 mAhHiSilicon Kirin 950

The tests

To conduct the tests I ran each phone until it had 1% battery left. I then activated a battery log app which records the battery level along with the time, the charging status, and so on. I then charged the phone up to full. During the charging I also tested the temperature on the back of the device to see how much the handset heats up during charging.  I then collated all this data into the results below!

The results

First let’s look at the charging graphs. Each graph shows the battery level over time. This enables us to see how long the phone takes to charge and how quickly it reaches 50%, 80% and 100%. Also on the graph, using the right axis, is the temperature difference during the charging cycle. You will notice that during phase 1 of charging the temperature goes up and then once the battery reaches 80% the temperature starts to fall as less and less power is pumped into the battery.

As with all results, it is the interpretation of the data that is key to understanding what is happening. Here are a few important metrics:

DeviceTotal charge time (mins)Charge rate (mAh/minute)Percentage of total charge time to reach 50%Percentage of total charge time to reach 80%Temperature change
Samsung Note 48338.833.358.611.7
Samsung Note 596.7830.9934.1760.958.5
Oppo R7s81.2337.8031.6852.913.3
Vivo X6D78.530.630.4054.398.1
Moto X Force84.7844.3529.053.119.9
Huawei Mate 8130.1730.7230.150.78.4

So what does this all mean. The device which charged the fastest was the Vivo X6D, but that isn’t surprising as it only has a 2400 mAh battery. The Huawei Mate 8 was the slowest to charge, but again that isn’t a surprise as it has a 4000 mAh battery. To level the playing field we need to see which device adds the most charge to the battery in one minute. This is calculated by dividing the battery size by the charging time. Using this metric we can see that the Moto X Force is charged the quickest, relative to its battery size, next comes the Note 4 and then the Oppo R7s.

In terms of which phone gets to 50% the quickest, that prize goes to the Vivo X6D, again because it has the smallest battery. However if we measure the time to 50% as a percentage of the overall charge time (working on the assumption that the charge time is longer for bigger batteries) then the Moto X Force is the fastest as it takes just 29% of the overall charge time. Close behind the Moto X Force is the Vivo X6D (at 30.6%) and the Huawei Mate 8 (at 30.72%).

The R7s only heated up 3 C during the testing, quite a phenomenal achievement.

The fastest to 80% is a close call between the Vivo X6D (which managed it in 42.72 minutes) and the Oppo R7s (which got there in 42.98 minutes). However, again, the battery size is paramount as the Oppo R7s has a 3070 mAh battery compared to the X6D’s 2400 mAh unit. Using percentage of total charge time we can see that the Huawei Mate 8 is actually the fastest as it gets to 80% in just 50.7% of its charge time. Next is the Oppo R7s, followed by the Moto X Force.

As for temperature changes, it seems that around 8 C is the median with the Mate 8, Vivo X6D and the Note 5 all registering temperature differences of between 8.1 and 8.5 degrees. The exceptions are the Note 4, the Moto X Force and the Oppo R7s. The first two register higher temperatures with the Moto X Force showing a 19.9 degree temperature difference during the charge cycle. At the other end of the scale is the Oppo R7s which heated up by just 3.3 C!

Fastest to charge-video-thumbSee also: Which Android phones charge the fastest?38

Charging while watching a video

There are times when you want to use your smartphone to watch a video or play a game but you know the battery doesn’t have enough juice left to get you to the end of the video. The normal solution is to plug your phone into the charger while you watch the video. But have you noticed that when you do that your phone doesn’t charge as quick. That is because while you are topping up the battery you are also using it (to watch the video). If the rate of consumption is close to the charging rate, you will find that your device doesn’t charge at all. One of the features of Oppo’s VOOC system is that you can charge your phone while watching a video and the device will actually charge at a reasonable rate.

To test this out I took the Galaxy Note 5 and the Oppo R7S and started a long YouTube video. The batteries in both phones were quite low (< 5%), so I plugged them into their chargers to see how long it takes them to recharge while streaming over Wi-Fi.

From the test results above, we know that when charging with the screen off, the Oppo R7S reaches full charge in around 81 minutes. While watching a YouTube video that number stays exactly the same! As does the time taken to reach 50% and 80%. In comparison the Note 5 takes 97 minutes to fully charge with the screen off. If you are streaming video over Wi-Fi that number jumps to 160 minutes! That is a 65 percent increase. Under these new conditions the Note 5 takes 74 minutes to get to 50% and 120 minutes to reach 80%.

Wrap-up

Picking an overall winner is hard. None of the devices (and their charging systems) stood out as exceptional. If you are looking for raw charging power then it seems that the Moto X Force is the clear winner. However that raw power comes with a price, namely the near 20 degree temperature rise. If that concerns you at all, then at the other end of the spectrum is VOOC from Oppo. The R7s only heated up 3 C during the testing, quite a phenomenal achievement consider that it charging speed is similar (if not better in some circumstances) with the other systems.

If you are the kind of person that is always charging your phone for short period just to top it up then the Moto X Force (TurboPower), the Huawei Mate 8 (SmartPower) and the Oppo R7s (VOOC) look like your best option. If you often watch videos while charging your device, then you will want to take a look at Oppo’s VOOC system.

What do you think? Do you have a favorite fast charging system? Any experiences you want to share?

  • Abhijeet

    Way too long Gary. Need more posts from you.

    btw, I’ll put my money in Moto X Force (out of the 6 mentioned here)

    • Vincent

      I have the droid turbo 2 which is essentially the same. It charges super fast. It does get alittle warm but not alarmingly so

  • David

    My Moto Turbocharger does 25W at 5, 9 and 12V, has the Moto X Force another one then the Style/Pure?

  • balcobomber25

    Your charge times are incredibly slow. I have a Meizu MX5 with 3050mAh and it takes about 55 mins to charge it fully.

    • Avinash Meghwansi

      I have Meizu mx5 too but they didn’t gave me a fast charger will aukey or transmort charge gonna work?

    • Avinash Meghwansi

      I bought it in India from snapdeal so please help me about it

      • balcobomber25

        Look on Aliexpress they have the original Meizu fast charger on there for around $14. I tried to post the link but it wouldn’t let me.

  • saksham

    my s6 edge goes from 0 to 50 in 15 mins :O

    • balcobomber25

      That’s because the battery is only 2600 on the S6.

  • Person Dude

    Sounds about right. My Droid Turbo 2 charges insanely fast, but it also heats up like a mofo when charging. For that reason I only use the TurboPower charger when I need a quick boost of power during the day, and I just use a normal charger for topping up at night.

  • JJ

    “Pump express” haha sounds like when everybody was saying deflated balls on tv. sex sells I guess lol

  • Mohd Danial

    I like opppo’s charging method. Its smoot unlike my g3

  • Tom

    What about Meizu’s mCharge? It is 5/9/12V with 2A, 24w max. It charges my Pro 5 pretty damn fast.

  • boertjeg

    Oppo’s VOOC temperature difference is quite the achievement. Battery capacity gets lower over time with the number of charges, but what people often forget is that a high temperature is detrimental to the life expectancy of a battery. Expect Oppo’s batteries to remain at a high capacity for a longer time and have a longer lifetime overall (compared to te other quick-charge technologies tested here). This is especially important for phones of which the batteries cant be replaced.

  • Kunal Narang

    Android Authority is the only site left that does real journalism in the field of Android. All the other websites are crap! Keep it up AA and @Gary Sims!

  • roccotool

    High temperature is the enemy of your phone battery. And with a finite number of charging cycles, I won’t allow the temp to lower the cycles. I might try VOOC from Oppo.

  • м ч × Φ м α † ● s ı s

    Thank you for such a complete, informative and comprehensive comparison.. I just wish you had provided more details when explaining the test procedure –I’m particularly interested in knowing which is the battery log app you used, if the phones were charged while turned on or off (and in case they were on, whether the screens were off the whole time or were turned on at any point).. thanx again, keep up the good work

  • sachouba

    This is a great article, thanks !

    The only thing I want to remark is that Samsung has always lowered the current provided by the charger when the display was on (since the Galaxy S4), probably to prevent the device from getting hot.

    For instance, the Galaxy S5 charges at 1.8A when the display is off, but only 1.2A when the display is on.
    It is not only the energy spent to watch a video that makes the device charge slower, it’s mainly this safety created by Samsung.

  • Mohamed Nagy

    can I use a qualcomm quick charge 2.0 charger with my huawei mate 8 ?
    can it harm the phone ?
    will it charge it as quickly as its original huawei charger ?

  • caleb

    The temps from the oppo seem to be lower because of how they distribute the charging pads on the battery. Rather than relegating 4 or 5 charging pads on one side of the battery, oppo distributes them directly adjacent to the cells of the battery. I’ll bet that direct placement is a good bit better on reducing internal resistance on the battery and in turn generates less heat.