If you’re bamboozled by terms like HSPA+, WiMax, TD-LTE, in addition to the more familiar 4G logo, and what they all mean for your network speeds and quality, we’re here to help. Let’s dig down into 4G vs. LTE, how they differ, and where the confusion lies.
The trouble deciding standards with 4G vs LTE
Although the International Telecommunications Union-Radio (ITU-R) decided upon the specifications for 4G back in 2008, it took much longer for carriers to build networks capable of meeting the official definition. Moving from 3G to 4G was a big deal for carriers, and it would take a series of network upgrades to get there, rather than one single jump.
The problem with creating wireless standards is twofold. First, the standards aren’t strictly enforceable, as the ITU-R has no control over carrier implementations. Second, the transition from an old standard to a new one doesn’t happen overnight. There’s a long period where early networks don’t necessarily match up with what consumers expect (as we’re seeing with 5G too). This is where LTE, which stands for Long-term Evolution, comes in. Instead of a technical standard like 4G, think of it as the means by which carriers took to match the official 4G specification.
Although all 4G LTE markets have passed this initial rollout stage now, some of these network types are still found in countries with less developed infrastructure. They’re also often still a fallback in areas with poor proper 4G coverage. If this all sounds a bit confusing, just look at the graphic below to see the sheer range of technologies out there.
“First-generation” 4G technologies, such as Mobile WiMAX and HSPA+, didn’t quite match up to the full specification but were still marketed as 4G technologies. This situation only became more complicated in October 2010, when the ITU-R completed its assessment of six different candidates to actually use to meet the full requirements of the planned 4G standard.
After much deliberation, LTE-Advanced and WirelessMAN-Advanced (WiMax Release 2) were designated as the IMT-Advanced compliant technologies, and the age of real 4G began. However, HSPA+, WiMAX and other LTE branded technologies were also labeled than 4G, despite not offering the full feature set promised by the “official” technologies. This was because many carriers and hardware manufacturers had already begun investing in these networks during the two and a half year deliberation.
The “true 4G” standard
As odd as it sounds, 4G LTE doesn’t actually meet the full specifications envision for the 4G standard. That said, these networks are faster than 3G, so it’s not a complete con. Although HSPA+ is much closer to 3G in 4G in terms of technology, and so doesn’t use the 4G icon these days.
LTE-Advanced (LTE-A) and Wireless MAX-Advanced are the networking technologies that actually meet the “true 4G” specifications, though LTE-Advanced is the naming scheme you’ll actually see in consumer markets. To differentiate them from previous 4G technologies, the ITU has defined them as “True 4G,” but you’ll very rarely ever see this term used.
LTE-A introduced a few important technological improvements to help carriers reach the speeds initially proposed for 4G. This includes carrier aggregation to make use of more bandwidth at once and improved Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) antennas to support this and improve cell edge coverage. However, this also required new smartphone modem and radio technologies, so early 4G handsets couldn’t benefit.
Want something faster: The best 5G phones you can buy right now
The 4G LTE standard continues to go through revisions, or Releases at the 3GPP call them. These introduce support for new aggregation bands and other technologies to increase data speeds without breaking away into an entirely new standard. The newest revisions fall under the LTE-A Pro moniker, promising even faster speeds. LTE really is living up to its name as a Long-term Evolution plan. Today’s consumer 4G LTE-A networks can hit speeds in excess of 1Gbps, surpassing the initial specification and making them faster than some early 5G deployments.
|Standard||HSPA+||WiMAX Rel 1||LTE||LTE-Advanced||WiMax Rel 2||"True 4G"|
|Download||84 Mbps||128 Mbps||100 Mbps||1000 Mbps||1000 Mbps||1000 Mbps|
|Upload||22 Mbps||56 Mbps||50 Mbps||500 Mbps||500 Mbps||500 Mbps|
However, talk of speeds is rather confusing, as the specifications often don’t define what as network’s users will actually receive. For example, even with LTE-A customers are more likely to be able to use speeds approaching 100 Mbit/s on mobile devices with a strong connection, while the 1Gbit/s speed is defined for low mobility wireless access points.
It’s also important to note that LTE-A isn’t just about handset download speeds. There is also a big push to improve infrastructure to accomodate the growing number of users, devices, and types of coverage required to offer fast downloads. LTE-A uses a mix of traditional macro cells and vastly improved small cells. The aim is to offer better high-speed coverage at the network’s edge and more bandwidth in congested areas. This idea is also the foundation of 5G networks.
A look at the 4G vs LTE market in 2020
The past several years have seen a much wider rollout of LTE-A, and carrier aggregated networks are now common around the world. Fast 4G LTE speeds are finally here, just in time for the industry to begin making the switch to 5G.
Accord to a recent GSA report into Gigabit LTE networks, 315 carriers have LTE-Advanced networks running in 142 territories so far. 32 of which offer speeds very close to or above 1Gbps. Although much of the industry’s attention focuses on 5G networks, 4G LTE remains the backbone of the world’s wireless networks and is still seeing its fair share of major improvements too.
The TL;DR of it is that LTE and LTE-A are both forms of 4G, but its the latter that has the capabilities to match the original specification and deliver the fastest data speeds. Fortunately, most 4G mobile networks are now using LTE-A and even more advanced technologies, allowing them to offer the fast speed envisioned all the way back in 2008.