Tip Us!

All input fields are optional, fill out as much or as little as you'd like.

Tegra 4 obliterates competition in benchmark scores: 36,000+ in AnTuTu, 16,000+ in Quadrant v2

by on February 25, 2013 6:53 am
11
views5363
35
50
92

Nvidia logo CES [aa] (3)

Synthetic benchmark suites do not always reflect real life performance, but they do give us a good idea of the performance of a mobile processor. Until actual production units hit the market, benchmark scores are the best guidance we have.

That’s why I was excited to learn that the new Tegra 4 system-on-a-chip has been put through its paces in a suite of benchmark applications, and the results are nothing short of amazing.

According to the folks at Engadget, who got some hands-on time with Tegra 4-powered reference devices provided by Nvidia, the new 4+1 cores chipset smashes previous records in benchmarks like AnTuTu, Quadrant, and SunSpider.

For instance, Tegra 4 scored 16,436 in the general-purpose Quadrant v2 benchmark. For comparison, the new HTC One with Snapdragon 600 scored 12,417 in a recent test, while the Nexus 4 (running a Snapdragon S4 Pro chip) scored less than 5,000.

In AnTuTu, another synthetic benchmark, the Tegra 4 reference tablet scored 36,305 points, more than three times the score of the Tegra 3-equipped Asus Transformer Pad Infinity.

The SunSpider benchmark is a JavaScript test suite that gives us a measure of how fast can a device load a website. Tegra 4 managed a very impressive 499ms (less is  more here). The iPad 4 scored 865ms in the same test.

In the graphics department, the Tegra 4 device scored 57 in the GLBench Offscreen, compared to the HTC One X+’s 37.

PC Magazine and other tech sites have also run these benchmarks with similar results. With the caveat that benchmark scores also depend on the software installed on the device, I am glad to see Nvidia making such impressive strides. Qualcomm really got the industry in a chokehold this year, so it’s good to see they still have some competition.

Unfortunately, Nvidia has warned that the soonest we can expect the first Tegra 4 equipped Android devices is late summer, so we still have  a lot to go until we get to test the Tegra 4 in real life. Meanwhile, Qualcomm promised that the Snapdragon 800 will beat the Tegra 4, and Samsung's Exynos 5 Octa chip shapes us to be quite competitive. Interesting times ahead!

Senior Editor

Google+ E-mail

I share neat stuff on Google Plus (Follow me) I'm here to report on the latest, most breaking developments in mobile technology, all the latest and greatest Android news, and to dig deeper on where Android is headed. I'll tell you one thing - we're in for a wild ride!
Comments
  • http://www.facebook.com/munchic.pham Munchic Pham

    Super fast CPU + super fast GPU = super fast battery draining

    • Dan Caloinescu

      Not necessarily. The time will tell.

    • Remcom00

      Depends on how high it´s clocked…

      • http://www.facebook.com/munchic.pham Munchic Pham

        1.9 Ghz is too much …

    • picard

      then nvida, err no, all ARM cpu manufacturer should make their own battery.

  • http://twitter.com/matter37 Matthew

    Look like it is good, but I think the same exact thing will happen in 2013 as happened in 2012: Tegra is released first and it is “amazing” then Exynos chips are better by a little bit, and finally Qualcomm comes in what feels to be late in the game and wimps their asses.

  • CyBrix_21

    Woah! That’s too high…

  • Roberto Tomás

    yup, they are in the clear until at least the 800 comes out .. if not longer. Hope they get an IGZO tablet design win soon!

  • http://twitter.com/_KID_ANDROID_ KID ANDROID

    This is great if they make a 5 or 6 thousand mah battery for whatever it goes in. You can make a large processor with a battery saving core but for ppl like me that use their device for like 10hrs at a time watching video or playing graphics intensive games that battery saving core does jack shit because it’snever running off of it.

  • Jusephe

    Cortex A-15 really screams… I am not sure if Qualcomm can beat this…

    Still A6X got very nice results… 839 ms for a dual-core at 1400 Mhz and 499 for a quand core at 1,9 Ghz, not to mention that A6X GPU is already faster than tegra 4 GPU.

    • danielghossein

      dude the a6x gpu isn’t faster than the tegra 4, tegra 4 scored higher!

Would you like to view our mobile friendly site? Try it out