t-mobile-music-legere ReCode

Recently, T-Mobile unveiled their latest “uncarrier” tactic which allows T-Mobile customers to use a number of streaming music services without having that data counted against their data caps if the customer is paying at least $50 per month. After the event, T-Mobile made it a point to tell reporters that none of the streaming services were paying T-Mobile anything to have their content bypass a customers data cap.

Although that is a significant difference compared to AT&T’s Sponsered Data program, T-Mobile is still giving those music streaming services a significant advantage over those not included. Subscribers are going to use those streaming services more over any other services so that they can save on their data caps. Therefore, this brings to light a legitimate net neutrality complaint.

T-Mobile argues that 85% of all music streaming is from these companies anyway and that they could very well add more services in the near future. On T-Mobile’s web-site, there is a poll which allows customers to vote on which service is to be added next to the music program. In fact, the FAQ on T-Mobile’s website notes that anyone, whether a subscriber or music service, can email T-Mobile and request a streaming service be added to the poll.

Free-streaming-music AndroidSpin

So, if that is the case, why not just allow all audio data to not count against someone’s data cap?

Unfortuately, ExtremeTech notes that this may not be feasible:

In order for something like that to work, T-Mobile’s system needs to understand all audio formats from the perspective of some sort of deep packet inspection and be able to decrypt any encrypted audio streams, should a music streaming service use encryption to protect the music from being ripped on the fly. While it may be possible to do the former, no one really wants anybody to do the latter. Arbitrarily decrypting media streams to read the encapsulated data is usually not a good idea, as the music service would not be very happy about it and could potentially block T-Mobile customers from accessing its service in retaliation. Using URI based whitelisting is much safer and less legally thorny.

While T-Mobile may in fact add all music services on the internet in the near future, the precedent will be set for this type of action by other carriers who won’t be as favorable as T-Mobile.


Michael Weinberg, a vice present at Public Knowledge, spoke to eWeek about the net neutrality implications of the T-Mobile announcement:

“It is certainly a violation of net neutrality. The premise of the net neutrality concept is to make sure “your ISP or your carrier isn’t acting as a gatekeeper. As a T-Mobile subscriber, it would suddenly really matter to you what T-Mobile is moving out of this newly un-throttled lane.”

“It calls into question their data cap generally,” said Weinberg. “When they were talking about [throttling] a year ago they were saying that it was about congestion concerns … but now they’re zero-rating some apps. If you can handle the extra music data, it suggests you don’t have the congestion cap issue you suggested in the first place.”

For years, AT&T has been trying to start their Sponsored Data program which gives more power outright to those with the deepest pockets over smaller content companies and start-ups.

att-sponsored-data iDownloadBlog

Under this model, giants such as ESPN, Facebook, Google and Twitter get to pay to have their services and content higher on peoples devices while others are virtually non-existent. In effect AT&T (and anyone else using this model) is using their market power to select winners and losers in the market, all the while consumers are the ones having the costs passed onto them.


  • Corbin Crutch

    It’s funny. I was thinnkin about all this as it was being announced

  • Julian Andres Klode

    Thanks, that’s what I said a few (2?) years ago when German T-Mobile introduced it. And recently, when American T-Mobile did. In Germany it’s worse though, as only Spotify is supported.

  • I am still surprised that nobody at T-Mobile apparently realized this. They seem caught off-guard by the NN talk

  • Macalee Harlis Jr.

    shut up and be happy as a consumer. lol We are not paying extra and neither are the service providers. Atts case I think has bigger implications of violating NN.

  • Daniel Collins

    This is no doubt a good thing. It essentially sets a precedent that says that net neutrality’s demise can work to the benefit of consumers, especially when ISPs have just kept screwing consumers over because of a lack of et neutrality. We might actually see some good come from a lack of Net Neutrality. Companies now have room to innovate, especially with limited bandwidth, like with mobile networks.

    • Joe Butler

      As William stated in the article, the point that this move really highlights is that carriers aren’t having these huge congestion problems that they continuously claim to have. Mobile data should be treated the same as wireline: unlimited data, and you pay for the speed.

      • Daniel Collins

        That would be cool.

      • Jorell

        the problem is that at least in my case, Comcast has a 250-300gb limit before you get charged for overages…

        • Joe Butler

          Yes, that is rediculous. Comcast is truly the worst.

  • annoyingposter7

    such a bs article, this has nothing to do with net neutrality. they aren’t inspecting the packets, the source of the data is their own servers.

  • NikkiPinodyo

    before I looked at the check of $8543 , I accept
    …that…my neighbour woz like they say truley earning money parttime on their
    apple labtop. . there sisters neighbour has done this 4 only 19 months and by
    now cleared the debts on their house and bourt a gorgeous Ford . visit this site