Tip Us!

All input fields are optional, fill out as much or as little as you'd like.

T-Mobile: iPhone’s price is too damn high

by on November 23, 2012 7:35 am
14
views4180
30
0
44

Even with a financial climate that’s proven extremely tough on a lot of businesses, it seems to still be profitable to provide telecommunications services in the United States. Verizon and AT&T’s customer portfolios have topped 100 million people recently, while struggling Sprint is set to be financially resuscitated via Japan’s SoftBank.

But wait, wasn’t there another major wireless carrier in the mix as well? Why yes there was, but T-Mobile’s recent financial streak has been anything but promising.

Magenta has lost out hugely following the 2011 failed acquisition by AT&T and is now seeing its revenue, income, assets, equity and customer numbers shrinking by the day. The carrier’s problems have led Deutsche Telekom, its parent company, to seek a merger with MetroPCS, but before that can happen, there’s a lot of soul-searching going on in Bellevue.

At a recent Barcelona conference, Jim Alling, COO of T-Mobile USA, touched upon a very delicate subject for T-Mo and an issue that’s thought to have been a major contributing factor to the company’s decline – Apple’s iPhones.

T-Mobile is not carrying Apple’s iPhone, nor does it plan to do so in the near future, as it feels it can’t bring any profit to the firm. “Make no mistake about it. We would love to carry the iPhone. However, we want the economies to be right for us.” said Alling.

Wait, what? What’s he talking about? The iPhone is the world’s best sold smartphone, so bringing it on T-Mobile can only drive sales and profits up, right? Well, we’re afraid it’s not that simple, because Apple doesn’t just hand out its products to carriers, but asks big money for the “privilege” to sell its iPhones.

Sprint, for example, which has started carrying the iPhone late last year, is said to have agreed upon a four-year, $15.5 billion deal with Apple. And while that has proven beneficial for the carrier as far as sales are concerned, actual profit is only expected after 2015.

T-Mobile’s radical view regarding the iPhone seems to be shared by the company’s future partner, MetroPCS, another carrier that’s currently hesitant in picking up Apple’s flagship. “It would be harmful to MetroPCS to have cut out part of our handset portfolio to accommodate one phone from one provider that the economics could be at risk.” said Tom Keys, COO at Metro back in August.

Turning back to Alling, he insisted that iPhone users are welcomed and nicely accommodated on T-Mobile, where the SIM-only Value Plans have attracted around 1.5 million unlocked iPhones. That’s not too shabby, but is it really enough?

Don’t get us wrong, we’re definitely not advocating for Apple’s profit margins, which are outright obscene in some cases, but can really T-Mobile survive and battle at the top without the most popular smartphones around? What do you guys think?

WRITER

Facebook Google+ E-mail

Adrian has an insatiable passion for writing ever since he was in school and found himself writing philosophical essays about the meaning of life and the differences between light and dark beer. Later, he found out that this is pretty much his only marketable skill, so he first created a personal blog and then discovered his true calling, which is writing about technology and gadgets in general and Android in particular.

YOU MIGHT LIKE

Verizon
Comments
  • Bone

    The 10% Octa is not really a supply issue but scheduling one, the final A15 Octa isn’t even ready for mass production, the first-gen version in the I9500 is NOT fully functional big.LITTLE. So the first phone officially to launch on the technology as it is intended will be the Note III, and I don’t expect supply issues for that. It’s probably 10% for the S4 so all resources could concentrate on that device, and it will be a monster phone.

  • kascollet

    This means Samsung has succeeded in securing the making of Apple’s A7 chip.
    Good for their financials, not for the Exynos line (but who cares, S600 is just great).

    • http://www.facebook.com/meng.yang.5095110 Meng Yang

      I thought A7 has gone to TSMC?

  • flamencoguy

    Redundant! We all know 1 in 10 is 10% by now. Tell us something we don’t already know.

  • Wuhan Ossetian

    I don’t get how qualcomm , a company that primary job is to make mobile chips, can make a chip a 1.9 GHz that’s less powerful then one by Samsung at 1.6 GHz.

    • kascollet

      There must be another 1000 examples of that kind of situation in the computer history. Frequency is just one of the factors (out of many) that lead to performance.
      And don’t forget that frequency is also an enemy in a mobile device.

    • http://www.facebook.com/meng.yang.5095110 Meng Yang

      A15 1.6 GHz > Krait(A9+) 1.9 GHz

      • Wuhan Ossetin

        I thought krait were based on a15?

Would you like to view our mobile friendly site? Try it out