Sony Xperia Odin gets detailed some more, starts to look less impressive

November 26, 2012
4
107
54 23 30

It’s pretty weird to say this about a device that’s not Samsung or Google-made, but Sony’s Xperia Odin looked like the most anticipated phone to get an early 2013 unveiling.

And we’re not saying that just because the handheld has been extensively making the rumor rounds of late, but also because the rumors revealed a lot of juicy things.

Unfortunately, that might as well come to an end today when we’re hearing the first less than impressive story about the Odin. The phone was spotted in an AnTuTu benchmark test and, based on that, we’re starting to doubt it will equipped with the early rumored quad-core Snapdragon S4 Pro CPU.

The Odin only scored a total of 8,753 points in AnTuTu, which is not only less than impressive, but mediocre altogether. For comparison, we’ve seen the quad-core LG Optimus G and Samsung Galaxy Note 2 score over 13,500 in the same benchmark, so chances are Sony’s “flagship” will only be a dual-core device after all.

Then again, it’s possible this is just a testing unit of the Odin, but if that’s the case Sony has a lot of work to do and an early 2013 release becomes unlikely.

On the flip side (there is one), it seems that the Xperia Odin will still come with 2 GB of RAM, 32 GB of on-board storage, microSD support, a 5-inch full HD display, a 13 MP rear-facing shooter, a 2,370 mAh battery and Android 4.1.1 Jelly Bean, all of which are top-tier specs. But will those be enough to make up for the supposed low performance of this big guy’s chip? We can only wait and see.

Comments

  • MasterMuffin

    Maybe the score is so low because of the extra pixels that the Snappy has to handle?

  • XYZ

    The Odin has more or less twice as many pixels to push as either of those devices (1920×1080 vs 1280×720). Its wholly unsurprising that its scoring lower on benchmarks. Besides, benchmarks are secondary to real-world usage. If the device can run the OS at a consistant 60fps (or as close as possible) then the benchmarks are irrelevant.

    • trob6969

      The pixel count isn’t the reason it scored low because the HTC J Butterfly has the same pixel count and display size but it scores 13,827.

  • bossman

    article printed above shows how narrow tech experts can be. this is more accurate http://www.rethink-wireless.com/2012/11/30/sony-yuga-concept-device-leaked.htm