Although Apple’s recently launched iPhone 4S disappointed quite a lot of people primarily because it’s just an “iPhone 4 with better specs,” the iPhone 4S remains a sturdy contender against currently existing high-end Android smartphones.
In this comparison review, Android Authority gives you a rundown of the iPhone 4S and the Motorola DROID Bionic, which Verizon unleashed just last month.
Which of the two smartphones has the upper hand? Read on to find out.
Suprisingly, Apple did not make any significant changes to the iPhone 4S. Just like the iPhone 4, the iPhone 4S will retain its glossy back and front cover, with an aluminum edging design. It also has the same dimensions as its predecessor.
Size-wise, the iPhone 4S is more pocketable, owing to its smaller size than the Motorola DROID Bionic’s. The overall size of the iPhone 4S also accounts for its lighter weight–a full 20 grams lighter than the Motorola DROID Bionic.
The DROID Bionic, on the other hand, has smooth curved corners, a design element it inherited from the Motorola Photon 4G. The screen is surrounded with a metal skeleton, while the body is encapsulated in a metal frame–giving the phone its rigid structure.
Yet, although the two phones differ in sizes, different people might have different impressions of which device is easier to grasp. Owing to its small size, the iPhone 4S looks like an easy pick for someone who wants an easy-to-hold device. The Motorola DROID Bionic, meanwhile, despite being bigger than the iPhone 4S, remains easy to hold in one’s hand.
The DROID Bionic also has a bigger and thicker structure than the iPhone 4S, which can be explained by its internal hardware–such as a bigger battery, LTE radios, and built-in slots for microSD cards and USB devices.
Thus, on the basis of form factor, size, and physical attributes, the iPhone 4S wins over the bigger and heavier DROID Bionic. As for the beauty aspect of the two phones external appearances, we leave the judgment to you, since perception of beauty, as always, lies in the eyes of the beholder.
The DROID Bionic sports a wider 4.3-inch Pentile-matrix TFT LCD with a 960×540 resolution. The bigger screen size seems to be advantageous in enhancing Web browsing and provides a wider viewing space for images and videos.
In contrast, the iPhone 4S has a smaller screen size–a 3.5-inch IPS LCD display and gives you a crisper display with its 960×640 resolution screen. The iPhone 4S, in fact, has a higher pixel density than the DROID Bionic’s, owing to the Apple phone’s smaller screen and high resolution.
Most people would prefer a phone with a wider screen (e.g., the Motorola DROID Bionic), since it provides more space and is easier to handle especially by those who have big thumbs/fingers. But, if you would rather go for crisper images, the iPhone 4S with its high pixel density display will be ideal for you.
The Motorola DROID Bionic runs on Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread powered by an OMAP 4430 chipset clocked at 1.0 GHz. The iPhone 4S, on the other hand, runs iOS 5 on top of an Apple A5 chipset clocked at (most likely) 1.0 GHz. Both phones’ processors are dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 processors, which imply that they have comparable processing powers.
In terms of RAM, the DROID Bionic boasts of bigger RAM–1 gigabyte of volatile memory compared to the iPhone 4S’s 512 megabytes. The amount of RAM matters a lot in overall processing power.
For storage, the iPhone 4S has 16-GB, 32-GB, and 64-GB models. However, whatever model you get, you will forever be stuck to the storage capacity of that model, since the iPhone 4S has no way of adding more storage.
In contrast, the Motorola DROID Bionic only has a 16-gigabyte model. You actually get 16 GB of storage built in, and another 16 GB microSD card preinstalled–so, you’re practically getting a total of 32 GB of storage right out of the box. And, if you so choose, you can replace the microSD card with another one with bigger capacity (up to 32 GB).
The DROID Bionic also comes with the ZumoCast app preinstalled. ZumoCast practically allows the DROID Bionic to use more storage hosted on a remote computer without having to store files into the DROID Bionic itself.
Apple has successfully packed more power into the iPhone 4S’s 1,420-mAh battery that offers up to 8 hours of continuous talk time. This has been a great achievement from Apple since the iPhone 4S’s predecessor–the iPhone 4–has the same 9.3-mm thickness with a lesser battery capacity of 6 hours talk time.
In contrast, the thicker DROID Bionic carries a battery rated at 1,735 mAh. Motorola claims that the phone offers up to 10 hours of continuous talk time. It has also been reported to last up to 8 hours with LTE enabled.
The DROID Bionic may be thicker because of its bigger-capacity battery, but the extra thickness can be considered a trade-off for continuous talk time that is 2 hours longer than the iPhone 4S’s. Besides, while the iPhone 4S offers only 8 hours of talk time, that same amount of time can be used on the DROID Bionic with LTE enabled.
The Motorola DROID Bionic supports Verizon’s LTE network, which offers faster 4G data access compared to a 3G network. 4G LTE is reportedly capable of speeds up to 10 times faster than that offered by HSPA+ or WiMAX.
In terms of data network speed, the Motorola DROID Bionic seems to promise faster connectivity compared to the iPhone 4S’s 3G-only connectivity.
As far as photo and video resolution is concerned, both the Motorola DROID Bionic and the iPhone 4S are capable of the same resolution quality.
Yet, the iPhone 4S seems to have the upper hand when it comes to snapping photos. Motorola is quite well-known in the telecommunications hardware department, but not so in the camera department.
The iPhone 4S’s camera reportedly focuses and shoots faster than the DROID Bionic’s. Apple also threw in an “image stabilization” solution into the iPhone 4S.
This isn’t saying, however, that the DROID Bionic’s camera produces horrible, awful photos. Far from the truth, the DROID Bionic is capable of good quality photos.
As far as photo quality is concerned, the iPhone 4S gets the upper hand. If your primary use of your smartphone is for picture-taking, then it’s a great smartphone to own. Yet, those who are content with good, quality photos would also find the DROID Bionic’s camera acceptable enough.
Where it sucks in photo quality, the Motorola DROID Bionic compensates for with Flash support. This means the DROID Bionic can play Flash animations and movies that many websites have been enriched with these days. The iPhone 4S, however, simply has no such capability. Flash is not natively supported in the iPhone 4S.
The iPhone 4S is relatively cheaper than the DROID Bionic. With a 16-GB model, you can save as much as US$100 when you purchase an iPhone 4S. Can you use the excess US$100 to buy additional storage? Sadly, no. You’ll be stuck with 16 gigabytes for good.
Though the 16-GB model of the DROID Bionic costs US$100 more than the iPhone 4S’s 16-GB model, the DROID Bionic comes preinstalled with a 16-GB microSD card, which can be easily replaced with a 32-GB card. Buy as many expansion cards as you like. The DROID Bionic will take them all–one at a time, though. It might be a little inconvenient to swap between cards, but the ability to swap memory cards is in itself a convenience that the DROID Bionic provides–and which the iPhone 4S does not.
Despite its heavier build, the DROID Bionic offers more battery power, just enough for it to survive at work or outdoors before requiring a power charge. It also supports slots and ports for extended memory and connectivity–which Apple failed to add into its latest smartphone.
In contrast to the iPhone 4S’s screen size, the DROID Bionic has a wider screen which gives you enough space and viewing area. Display-wise, however, the iPhone 4S is a better choice for those who wish crisper and sharper display resolutions. Yet, owing to the bigger screen size, the DROID Bionic just might be a better pick for those who want a wider viewing area and wider screen for touch input.
Another big plus point for the DROID Bionic are its 4G LTE capabilities and built-in Flash support.
In terms of camera performance, the iPhone 4S offers a better experience. Some people do judge a smartphone by its camera and photo quality, but most folks can live with good and acceptable photo quality such as the DROID Bionic can provide.
The two smartphones offer similar features in several areas, and they also differ in others. Where they diverge, the differences between the two devices are wide enough to provide smartphone buyers choice. The final determining factor, of course, is each buyer’s subjective preference. The final decision still remains entirely up to you.
My personal pick is the DROID Bionic because of its power and performance, flexible storage, data connection speed, and bigger viewing area.
Between the slimmer and sexier iPhone 4S or the bigger and heavier Motorola DROID Bionic, what is your choice?
Which phone is better?
Image credit: Apple, Droid Life, Engadget
Droid Bionic is for $149 on various websites like Amazonwireless.
The comparison is incomplete without the mention of the operating systems and touch n feel of the devices.
The pricing comparison is not correct. Since the 16GB Bionic comes with a 16GB microSD card it’s 32GB out of the box. That meakes it equal in price not $100 more then the 4S
The Droid Bionic wins! They have 4G and it is blazing with speed! Additionally, you can get the droid for as low as $149 and it does have 16GB installed and a 16GB microSD card which makes it 32GB. You can also change the 16GB card to that of a 32GB card if you desire. Droid has over 200,000 after market apps and I-Phone has over 500,00? Well, who is really going to even use 200? Geez!
Where do you see it available for 149…? Amazonwireless has it for 249.
Actually, Amazonwireless now has the bionic for 99 cents through 10/17 with a two year service plan.
I also got a bionic. It’a way better phone than 4s. Motorola did a good job in putting the phone together. But it seriouly falls behind in marketing. Plus the fan following going by the looks and image. This phone is blazingly fast. I cant find the hdmi port or a usb port or expandable memory on the iphone. What a gr8 feature to watch videos on tv. Love the google maps on this phone. Could mount this phone on my cars gps mount and talk to it without a bluetooth. I also find the phone as responsive as the iphone and can play flash without showing an empty spot. This is an awesome device.
No mention of Siri? That alone makes the iPhone a winner!
Siri is nothing new I’ve been doing the same thing on my Dx with vlingo for a long time.
What about free [5GB] iClould service that comes with iPhone 4s. Find My Friends is going to be populars with the teens (may be techies won’t care – but they are minority)
With Google Cloud services & Amazon cloud, there are plenty of options beside iCloud.
no mention of the siri feature on the iphone 4S.
Its Just An App There are others like it for all smart phones nothing new
Who cares about expandable memory? So you can buy MORE stuff after you buy the phone itself in order to have 16 less gigs… Doesn’t sound like a perk to me. The BIONIC seems like a great phone if you can put up with the Droid interface. Which if you’re like me and have used an iPhone, the Droid are near impossible to tolerate. And Siri is going to be amazing. It’s absence in this comparison favors the BIONIC heavily.
The Bionic doesn’t come with 16gb less it comes with 32gb split between an internal card and an external swappable card. And they might have left out some features of the iPhone but they also left out some feature for the Bionic. The Bionic has 1gb of DDR2 laptop grade ram. Siri is going to amazing, if it works like they say it does. With Androids open market though, I’m sure some geek will find a way to clone Siri and offer it on the android anyways. An open market is the biggest reason why I’m an Android fan. Apple’s closed systems = slavery
This is pretty much a strictly hardware comparison between the two devices. Siri does not give the iPhone 4S an edge, it’s just software. With these devices you can root or jailbreak, and add practically any software you’d like. Plus, Siri is just voice control, the same voice control that I had on my old flip phone, Apple just made it understand more commands. Don’t get me wrong, the iPhone is an amazing device, but the Bionic just has better hardware specs. You’re just going to have to deal with that.
I don’t have either but I’m about to buy one of the two. The hardware specs of both are great really, but what I’m wondering is how do they compare in real life? Which one opens the apps faster? apple also is clamming to have doubled the speed of the 3g service from 7 to 14mbs, if true does that come close to 4LTE? Especially seems how 4g isn’t available in to many places but might be before my next upgrade.
4g lte, hdmi out, 1g ram, flash, with no need of a dead ex-ceo to raise the hype another 3g phone. Siri this and that….lame! nothing new. Android has had google voice app for a while now, thats old news. Bionic > iphone 4s
Amazon is listing the bionic for 1c this week with a new contract.
Well done Apple, what a load of shit. No Flash support = Lame! No expandable memory = Lame! For those reasons alone I would not buy the phone. Screen is also too small. All the mindless Apple Zombies will flock to it though.
What would you rather have annoying talking GPS I mean SARI or 4GLTE
Thks for a well written and thorough article. Seems like the 4s is a bit anticlimactic to the 5 hype that didn’t materialize. Appreciate Apple ingenuity and skill but it’s hard to stay out front (just watch any cycling race like Tour de France … breakaways are usually caught and passed by the peleton).
Excuse my ignorance but is bionic available on ATT? Multitasking is the ONLY feature that could keep me there. Thks again.
I was comparing hand in hand both phones. The difference in website upload speed was less then a second. Picture quality is incomparable, iPhone photos were much better quality. When watching videos off the internet the quality of the videos was also much better on the iPhone. I like the external memory on the bionic, but I have never ran out of space with a 16gb phone and I assume most people don’t. Even though we are in a large city the 4g coverage was coming in and out while we were comparing the phones.
the two has made a hugeee success but the droid bionic is greater because it has a larger screen and a better searching or video watching and has the same camera resolution and i own the two iphone 4s and bionic and the bionic is the best smart phone ever so i can say everybody bionic is better than IOS 5
Replaceable battery on my bionic has come in handy many times. Can’t do that with iPhone.
I just got the Droid Bionic and am not liking it because it’s too big. I miss my Blackberry!