Tip Us!

All input fields are optional, fill out as much or as little as you'd like.

Mobile phone unlocking will be illegal by January 26

by on January 25, 2013 6:58 am
25
views12009
0
0
0

banner-galaxy-s3-i9300-galaxsim-unlock-120905If you have a network-locked mobile phone in your hands, you might want to consider having it unlocked soon. By tomorrow, January 26th, it will already be a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to unlock a mobile phone without permission from your carrier.

Recall that in October, the Librarian of Congress gave a 90-day window for smartphone buyers to unlock their phones, and that window lapses tomorrow. This means that you will need to get express permission from AT&T, for instance, before you can use your SIM-equipped smartphone with another network. However, you will be legally allowed to unlock your device once it's out of contract, or if you have paid the full price, as opposed to getting the phone via subsidy.

There are exceptions, though. According to our previous report on the matter, the ruling allows users to arbitrarily unlock smartphones purchased before January 2013. Of course, some carriers already offer their smartphones unlocked from the box, such as Verizon's iPhone 5. Apple also sells the iPhone 5 unlocked for $649, while we Android lovers can always opt for the $299 Google Nexus 4 from the Google Play Store, which does not come with network locks or carrier subsidies.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has criticized the Librarian of Congress for this seemingly unfair use of the DMCA provisions. ”Arguably, locking phone users into one carrier is not at all what the DMCA was meant to do. It's up to the courts to decide,” said the advocacy group in a statement.

In a statement to TechNewsDaily, Christopher S. Reed from the U.S. Copyright Office clarified that “only a consumer, who is also the owner of the copy of software on the handset under the law, may unlock the handset.” However, the Librarian of Congress had clarified that software in smartphones and other devices will remain the intellectual property of the developer. Meanwhile, users are only granted rights and licenses under the EULA. As such, it will no longer be within fair use to break network locks because you don't own the phone's software in the first place.

Perhaps this will be one main driver toward user preference for bring-your-own device setups that carriers like T-Mobile are now promoting.

Update: We have interesting comments on our Google+ post covering this article. Some suggest a workaround: you can actually backup the phone's stock OS, and then re-flash it with a custom unlocked ROM. That way, you essentially preserve the software — which the phone company or carrier owns — so that you can legally unlock the phone.

JUNIOR EDITOR

Facebook Google+ E-mail

J. Angelo Racoma is a journalist and community manager with a keen eye for emerging standards and technologies. He is passionate about the enabling nature of mobile devices in both emerging and established markets. Aside from mobile and apps, Angelo has an interest in enterprise software and technology startups as an editor for Tech Wire Asia and e27.co.

YOU MIGHT LIKE

Comments
  • http://www.facebook.com/georgealexiouvalentey George Av

    SUCK MA NIPPLES YANKEES!!!! :D only in the US

  • StevenLockey

    Ah so basically all it really says is you can’t unlock it till your contract is up (since at that point you legally own the phone, instead of it been owned by the phone company, which it is for the initial duration of the contract)

  • fawfsag

    Too bad Americans…

    • AndroidBrian

      Law can’t be enforced. Probably just void warranty. Which rooting your phone already does anyways.

  • friech34

    OMG how can i used my phone to other country

    http://www.crackedportal.blogspot.com

  • MasterMuffin

    And how are they going to control this?

    • http://www.facebook.com/georgealexiouvalentey George Av

      my thought exactly, how? we all know there will still be scumbags jailbreaking iphones wishing they where android phones. but hey, it says nothing about rooting :D

      • MasterMuffin

        And it’s only in America! :)

      • http://twitter.com/piyushr21 Piyush

        doucebag read carefully , its not about jailbreaking , its about unlocking phone will be illegal even for android to , and jailbreaking is legal . this kind of fanboyism makes android looks like fandroid.

        • http://www.facebook.com/georgealexiouvalentey George Av

          to UNLOCK a IPHONE you need to jailbreak. as far as i know.

          • http://twitter.com/piyushr21 Piyush

            you can unlock iphone using gevey sim also and jailbreak unlocking is only for 3gs and 4 only

          • http://www.facebook.com/georgealexiouvalentey George Av

            ok!! well, thanks for correcting me.

  • emocrazy

    well it’s just stupid..

  • http://www.facebook.com/domagoj.tokic Domagoj Tokić

    LOL America. You can shoot person if he/she in on your property, but you can’t unlock your phone. I guess phone isn’t your property ;)

    • Mike

      Dude, you have no idea about what subsidizing a phone is, do you? I’m sure there is no such a thing in Croatia. Also, what does butter has to do with shampoo?

      • http://www.facebook.com/domagoj.tokic Domagoj Tokić

        If you buy something, you should are to do anything with/on it unless it’s harmful to other people because you are the owner. If you buy a phone, you can throw it against the wall if you want, but nooooo… you mustn’t unlock it, that’s crime against humanity.

        • Eduardo Covarrubias

          While I understand your sentiment, you technically don’t own something until you buy it. As it stands a lot of carriers require you to return the phones if you cancel out of a contract prematurely. A subsidized phone is the equivalent of a leased vehicle and people still modify their vehicles with aftermarket parts even if it’s against the terms of leasing. That being said, I don’t see why people wont unlock their phone, with very little repercussions likely to happen. This could also be a blessing in disguise and we’ll see more companies follow in the foot steps of T-Mobile and offer un-subsidized plans.

          • http://www.facebook.com/domagoj.tokic Domagoj Tokić

            Oh, I guess it doesn’t work like that in Croatia. There is no way you can return the phone. It isn’t anything like leasing. You write a contract and you have to pay for the phone no matter what – no returns accepted. They’ll sue your ass if you won’t pay and they don’t care if you want to return the phone.

    • Rhyno

      You can’t shoot people just for being on your property– only if they’re breaking into your home. This law won’t stop anyone from jailbreaking their phones.

  • Aziz Farhi

    Lol, Illegal my ass. people will carry on unlocking their phones whenever they want to. DMCA can’t do shit to control this.

  • nexus2012

    too bad for us americans? its only a stupid phone! i dont think this is right to do, but i would rather be able to have freedom of speech and religion and what not then unlock my dumb phone. get the priorities straight! america is the greatest country ever. for now

  • AndroidBrian

    This is being blown out of proportion. If you call your carrier and ask for a unlock code they give it to you. Well at least T-Mobile does. And it states you can unlock if you have your carriers permission. So why does this even matter?

    Besides it can never be enforced. Its pretty much just a dumb way to scare people into not unlocking there phones without going through your carrier.

    • LockedIn

      AT&T will not unlock your phone for you. I purchased a used phone and they would not unlock it because it was within the original owner’s contract period, even though the original owner terminated his contract. Locking phones to a network is about creating technological lock-in and preventing marketplace competition.

  • nonyabizness

    Here’s an idea … on your next trip abroad … done! And show the finger to the corporation owned US Congress

    And to the fellow who thinks this isn’t about freedom of speech, note that it is. If you haven’t figured out long-term implications of this, watch out.


Would you like to view our mobile friendly site? Try it out