Tip Us!

All input fields are optional, fill out as much or as little as you'd like.

How many Samsung execs does it take to talk war against Apple? ‘About 200.’

by on November 15, 2012 5:23 pm
1
views1607
22
0
7

The war on Apple is a serious matter for Samsung, which is fighting the iPhone maker in a variety of patent-based battles in multiple markets.

While the company has scored some recent victories against Apple in the UK, where the latter has been ordered to pay all of Samsung’s legal fees after disregarding the courts instructions related to a certain apology to the South Korean company, it’s still Apple that won the most favorable rulings so far, including the late-August $1.05 billion verdict.

Samsung is yet to pay any damages to Apple, as we’re looking at more legal proceedings scheduled for December in this first U.S. case between the two. But Apple is apparently a problem for Samsung, one that will be discussed at an upcoming Samsung internal event.

According to South Korean publication Chosunilbo, the company has scheduled a top executives meeting for December 17-18, when “about 200 chiefs of overseas branches” will meet to talk strategy related to “the global recession” but also about “an intensifying standoff with rival Apple.”

While in previous years, the annual global strategy meeting “often set business goals for the following year,” now the 200 execs will talk “new guidelines for the tech giant’s worldwide sales network,” with Apple probably coming up quite a few times considering that the two giants have an undisputed monopoly on smartphone profits.

As for the legal matters between them, just a few days ago we heard that Samsung does not want to settle with Apple, like HTC did, and that it prefers to wage that war in courts. With that in mind, it will be interesting to see what these 200 execs will decide in mid-December, especially considering that the upcoming Apple-Samsung hearing in the U.S. will take place on December 6.

While we wait, we can only point you to the most recent Apple vs Samsung spoof video and serve the obvious joke: how many Samsung execs does it take to talk war against Samsung? “About 200.”

JUNIOR EDITOR

Google+ E-mail

Chris Smith is a writer, a blogger and a freelancer. He started writing about gadgets as a hobby and before he knew it he was sharing his views on tech-related stuff with readers around the world. Whenever he's not writing about gadgets he miserably fails to stay away from them, although he desperately tries. But that's not necessarily a bad thing.

YOU MIGHT LIKE

Samsung Galaxy S4 Brown
Comments
  • uu

    Great.
    Does it mean samsung will not have any problems manufacturing millions of devices without using plastic? I think it is now time for them to leave hyperglazed in the dust

  • simpleas

    Gosh I love these guys!

  • RarestName

    They keep costs down because plastic is cheaper than other materials. Not complaining though.

  • Mark

    Samsung rocks, I love it.

    Regards
    BuyCheapIndia . com

  • http://twitter.com/Gilles__LeBlanc Gilles LeBlanc

    Please always make room for us wealthy folk aswell. Produce a premium device and charge as much as you want. Dont get all crazy with this cuting cost stuff. Loving my note 2 thanks.

    • simpleas

      lol “wealthy folks”.. I dont think you have to be wealth to own a top tier smart phone. I do agree, Note 2 rocks!

  • nishantsirohi123

    the comments section should be renamed as “whiny bimbos sections”

    none of these people here have any knowledge whatsoever about what is being discussed in this article or what it means for the smartphone industry.

    I feel this a great initiative by samsung. They could very well be taking orders from other device manufacturers as well
    this is basically great from small time device makers with innovative ideas(remember yotaphone) to actually churn out devices with similar level of quality and less investment required for setting up of a manufacturing unit(of course most companies have vendors who make the devices for them)

  • candlelarbra5212

    Why do some people think this is good thing? (besides what I beg to be sarcastic comments) More money for a company who already makes billions? Well this is just the best news ever.

    What it really means is people losing their jobs, losing them fast and probably without any other job after their redundancy.

    I mean you’ve got companies who pay so little to their workers in the first place but then they have to remove them completely. Hardly a shining beacon of hope to starving millions who need to get out of poverty (or even eat) one way or another.

    • Dash Foster

      This is a really good point that you bring up. Unfortunately Samsung is not the only company that does this, most of the clothing manufactures in the Unites States still use sweat shops in developing countries. Its cool that you looked at this in a different way and realized what is really happening.

    • http://www.facebook.com/Trent8381 Trent Richards

      Where I am not without compassion for people that may lose their jobs, you can’t expect businesses to make decisions that go against profitability and success for the sake of saving jobs. I know many people believe this makes a company evil, but what you need to remind yourself is that companies aren’t started to provide a job for people. Too many times people expect businesses to behave as charities. I have been on the raw end of 2 downsizings in my career, so I understand the position it puts people in. However, I was able to get back on my feet on both occasions and life carried on. Also where some manufacturing jobs will be lost, some distribution and sales jobs will likely open due to higher product output.

  • rvichar

    I thought the galaxy was based on the human experience and nature. How about humans stop buying all this plastic and silicone cranked out every six months. The cycle is a vicious cycle of endless waste.

  • Ruzveh

    I am personally not in favour of what Samsung is following. This also means that there will be job losses and many manufacturer will be forced to adopt this practise since they will face tight competition from Samsung. If little increase in price of a mobile phone can run millions of homes then why not?

  • LeoN N

    Samsung Skynet…here it comes…get ready John Connor!

  • http://www.facebook.com/shi.cheeliang Chee Liang Shi

    No guarantees on whether cost savings is transferred to the consumers or not… my guess is that it’s not… simply cost savings to increase their profits i guess… so how does that make this news a good thing? it is simply irrelevant except from a technological point of view…

    Beside it will just give them more reasons to crank out 120 million phones which are named differently but all sport the same design…

  • jj

    The main lesson other companies will learn is fire some thousands of workers and let their families starve.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeiybee Julius Jb Benter

    i wish i won this awsome phone :)

  • http://twitter.com/demlasjr Laszlo Demeter

    Hey guys, there are many people who want the S4, but not with 16GB.

    Please consider signing this petition. Help us to get 1000 signatures !

    http://www.change.org/petitions/release-the-samsung-galaxy-s4-with-32-and-64-gb-internal-memory

Would you like to view our mobile friendly site? Try it out