Let’s not worry about Google Glass being banned

March 25, 2013

    Google Glass Press (3)

    There’s a lot of news lately about Google Glass being shunned, and outlawed. Bars are banning it, lawmakers are considering making it illegal to use in a car… it’s madness! If you’re wondering what the point is in picking up a pair when they come out, don’t. This lashing out against Glass is silly. Here’s why.

    Glass isn’t here

    Google Glass is little more than a working concept at this point. What does it do? Who is designing apps for it? We don’t know. We know it’s secretive, and those who have tested it at the Glass Foundry events are bound by a non-disclosure agreement. We know it looks cool, and will take pictures and video. We know it will help us navigate, and even translate. We know it will be helpful, but nothing more.

    Currently, what we see via the Google Glass website is conceptual. All those I’ve spoken to about Glass that have actually tried Glass tell me the UI is still pretty crude. Google Now is probably going to be a focus, but that’s not set in stone. Actually, with Glass, we don’t know that anything is necessarily set in stone. We don’t actually know anything!

    Been there, done that

    Remember when camera phones were a new concept? Maybe you don’t, but there was a time when a phone with a camera was a radical concept that scared people. How would we regulate it? Everyone will be taking pictures of everything! It sounded like anarchy in the eyes of the press… but now we see how silly that was. If you have a phone without a camera, you’re probably a hipster who bought the phone at a swap-meet so you could be ‘ironic’. The real irony is that camera phones are now considered crucial, as we want to capture all of our memories without toting around an additional piece of hardware.

    phone camera

    Same difference

    Google Glass is not a phone with a camera, but it may travel the same arc of public perception. With a phone, the fervor was that you couldn’t tell a camera phone from a regular one. Who would be taking photos of what, and when? For those reasons, it was frightening to some. Google Glass will face the same challenges, as it’s not clear to us (yet!) when someone will be filming or snapping photos. The functionality isn’t clear because we don’t know anything about Glass yet.

    To ban someone from an establishment for wearing Google Glass is tantamount to profiling. Simply having something that can do something doesn’t mean we will be doing it. If I have prescription glasses, and those happen to be Google Glass, am I now banned from an establishment? I need those glasses to see, and drive… so how can I be banned from using them? Is that really a fight you want to have, miscellaneous bar owner?

    More merit than danger

    Lawmakers are increasingly concerned with our level of responsibility. They think Google Glass will distract us from the task at hand, which is driving safely. This is their excuse for attempting to ban the device whilst driving, yet a much larger Tom-Tom or Garmin screen attached to the windshield is okay. I can turn a GPS device off just as I can Google Glass. I can have a TV mounted inside my car, yet a small screen giving me timely updates about my life is somehow worse?

    If the model we’ve seen Sergey Brin wearing is what the final production piece, then that small screen is right about the same spot in my visual periphery as the rear-view mirror on my car. I check that often, and it doesn’t divert my attention from the road. There is little reason to believe that Google Glass would distract a responsible driver, and that onus falls on you.

    Google Glass is meritorious, and not given the proper respect in that regard. Hot-button topics like safe driving or being taped without consent dominate the media coverage, but that’s irresponsible. It’s irresponsible because we don’t know anything about Glass yet. If we had a good idea of just what the device would be able to do, or otherwise capable of, we could reasonably concern ourselves with these issues.

    We’ve discussed the benefits to Glass previously, even in its crude form. What about personal security? How many crimes go unpunished or unreported due to lack of evidence? Even if it were a simple video-taking device, that video could auto-upload to your Google Drive account. Consider the store clerk, or woman walking alone at night. We are all concerned with security, but if we’re not doing anything wrong… there isn’t much to worry about with Google Glass and being filmed. Much like the recent Play Store policy change to not allow anonymous comments, Google Glass has the potential to keep people honest who otherwise may not be.

    Google Glass ban-w600

    Change is scary

    Google Glass has the potential to change everything. This product has the capacity to completely alter how we utilize mobile technology, and that scares some people. It’s unknown, which naturally causes alarm. We’re unsure about this massive change in direction, but that isn’t reason to decry Google Glass ad hoc. It’s a bit irresponsible to be so dismissive about technology we don’t know anything about yet.

    The same outcry occurred with cell phone cameras, then they became a normal part of life. Caution is a fantastic tool when utilized properly, but the fervor over Google Glass is not one of those examples. Fear should not be a driving force behind policy change, be it state law or a restaurant policy.

    Google Glass Press (1)

    Conclusion

    Google Glass is happening, like it or not. Just because the technology is new, and unknown, doesn’t make it dangerous. Some consider it safer, so should we make driving with Google Glass mandatory? No… that’s just silly. So is the flipside, which is banning it altogether.

    You can’t banish something that has no proven history of being dangerous or detrimental. Those same people who are damning the technology haven’t even tried it out, so how are they in a position to judge it? We needed massive amounts of proven cases where texting while driving was dangerous… yet an unseen, unproven piece of hardware is being considered harmful. This potential policy change is based on innuendo and conversation, not facts. It’s really hard to have a factual conversation about Google Glass, because we don’t know anything about it.

    If you want Google Glass, buy a pair when they become available. Your concern should be about which color frames you want, not being pulled over by the police for wearing them. Google Glass gives us no pause for actual concern, so lets not feed the fire. We’ve seen witch-hunts like this before, and look at how we view those events today. Laughable, abhorrent inanity. Someday, we’ll all search for these old articles about Glass… on Glass. That much we do know.

     

    Comments

    • http://google.com/+derekross Derek Ross

      Well written. I couldn’t have said it any better myself. These same fears happened 10 years ago. We survived once everyone had camera phones and they became the norm. I’m sure we’ll look back in another 10 years and laugh.

    • aholsteinson

      Great article as per usual :)

    • rk

      I hope they make google glass foldable. I can see situations where you would want to put them in your pocket or where google glass is banned.

    • http://twitter.com/myconoclast Dave

      Great article, but I think it’s a moot point. I can’t really imagine Google Glass ever catching on. I don’t even see many bluetooth headsets these days, so it’s hard to imagine a product like Google Glass would be acceptable to the general public. It will probably be one of those accessories like smartwatches which are interesting to a few early adopters but not practical enough for most consumers.

      • http://www.facebook.com/chris45389 Christopher Linnett

        As much as I’ve seen, they aren’t being used as accessories for phones, they are eventually meant to take the place of phones. This is a game changer, Just like smart phones. It will take some years, but eventually wearable devices like this will become mainstream. How convenient would it be, being able to do anything you can do on a smart phone, by a gesture, a blink pattern, or voice recognition. look up internet sites, play simple games.. Even think more distant futuristic technological uses of this kind of device, one that can even use impulses from your brain to control the device without anything but a thought. As far as I see it, its just baby steps and this is the next step

    • John Koetsier poyo

      LAME SWANNER AGAIN..
      good job
      but if not mistake u don’t like google right..

    • Eric

      I think it should be mandatory for Cops to wear and record, that way we see all of what they do to a suspect and that way its less likely they abuse their power. But their should be a definitive way for the camera to be off that way someone can’t hack into it and see what you do or where you are……. same with phones, tablets, TV’s, etc Privacy should be on everyone’s mind.

      • Joaquim Amado Lopes

        And why not ALSO (in uppercaps to mark that I don’t mean “instead”) “that way we see all of what suspects do when engaged by police officers and that way is less likely cops will be crucified by the media and the public for doing their job in aprehending criminals and defending their phisical integrity”?

    • Jelly Bean

      I value my privacy, thanks.

      • Filip Justin

        Ok.. then stay inside your house or live in the mountains..

    • Warriorkast

      Actually we see a lot more abuse of privacy with cell phone cameras than we see crime fighting. Which is why u tube is so funny. Lol. Let’s learn from all the cell phone issues. Besides if I’m not doing anything wrong what do I have to hide? Simple. It’s called privacy.

      • On a Clear Day

        It is nothing short of astounding that people have become so enamored of and desirous of their “15 minutes of fame” (look it up if you don’t know one of the most famous quotes of all time already).

        How dare anyone violate my privacy; film me or anyone I am with without my permission! Why would I want that anymore than I would want someone listening in to my private phone conversations, or taking pictures of me without my permission and posting them someplace? And do not say, “Get used to it.” Just because someone can transgress does not make a transgression any less abhorrent nor disgusting.

        It is a true measure of the superficiality and lack of both personal integrity and lack of self-respect for other’s privacy that an article like this can actually be called reasonable and Google Glass a product to be looked forward to. Normally I find Nate’s article good – this one reveals a lack of perspective that tells me perhaps he needs powerful corrective lens from an optician.

        It is no wonder people see America as being in a state of decline when products of this nature – which are better suited to spying and intrusive, police state tactics are touted as “revolutionary”.

        What total, absolute B. S. Time for people to grow, get a life and think about what the meaning of life is – rather than adopt one more distracting, useless and non-productive gadget designed (make mistake about it) to sell you something more that you have no real need for but which will make the creator tons more money that they will never have enough time to spend in this or a thousand lifetimes.

        I like Google’s approach to most things – but this is a waste of their resources and is right up their with self-abuse as a mature way to conduct oneself.

    • Joaquim Amado Lopes

      Stopped reading at “We know (Google Glass) looks cool”. Can’t read while laughing out loud.

    • matt

      I sort of understand the driving concern but its not that simple as people think google says they work with prescriptions and people can actualy need them to see plus there in GPS for a reason. As for the privacy if you think that this is the first thing that will make privacy obsolete then you are living under a rock. Also think about it is privacy really that important as long as you ar not doing any thing illegal it does not matter.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Murat-Enoz/1348170339 Murat Enoz

      This device will create an electromagnetic field right next to our skulls, may be it can have carcinogenic effects.

      Greetings,

      Murat

      http://www.blog.kulakburunbogaz.info

    • Ted_kazynski

      Fad. Won’t last. Watches are dumb too. Phones and tablets have a little more gas in the tank seeing how they are not tacky gadgets that you will wear. Look at blue tooth headsets everyone wearing those looks like an idiot, not to mention the fact that they look like they are randomly talking to themselves.

    • Jabs91

      I heard they may give it the ability to discover one’s identity by scanning someone insight. That’s wayyy too creepy & so disturbing of ones privacy. Ok I know some of you may say well if you have social media your pretty much all over the net anyway, true but I don’t have a possibly dangerous bystander instantly learn all about me. I will only like these glasses if they do not allow for that feature.
      Think about it, terrorists could even use that to their advantage, but people are too stupid to use logic these days. Just my opinion, so Idc if you agree or not.

    Popular

    Latest