Tip Us!

All input fields are optional, fill out as much or as little as you'd like.

Galaxy Nexus 2 (GT-I9260) sample images spotted on Picasa already

by on September 24, 2012 1:51 pm
14
views9715
40
0
40

A few days ago we told you that Samsung may just launch a new Nexus device in the near future, its third handset reportedly conceived with Google in as many years, the Galaxy Nexus 2, aka the GT-I9260. That model number is awfully close to the Galaxy Nexus’s GT-I9250 number, which is why almost everyone in the tech news-reporting business is speculating that we’re looking at the second-generation Galaxy Nexus device.

Corroborate the current Galaxy Nexus 2 rumors with other existing reports that suggest that Google will launch a variety of Nexus-branded devices this year (potential candidates are the Galaxy Nexus 2, the LG Optimus Nexus, the Sony Xperia Nexus or the HTC Nexus 5) and you’ll understand why it’s seems logical that the GT-I9260 would rather be called the Galaxy Nexus 2 instead of the Galaxy Premier, another moniker used for the device. Although Galaxy Nexus Premier would also make some sense, since Samsung would probably try to avoid having “Nexus 2″ anywhere in the name of a handset.

Today we’re looking at more evidence that shows us the Galaxy Nexus 2 is in testing. GSM Arena shows us a photo uploaded to Picasa on September 19 from the Samsung GT-I9260. According to EXIF information from the image, the camera of the device features a F/2.65 aperture and 4mm focal length, a camera that’s similar to the one found on the Galaxy S2. Furthermore, one of the images reveals “a portion of an Excel window with a table listing Bluetooth specs for something, but there’s nothing interesting that can be made out. “

The GT-I9260 is also said to feature a similar 4.65-inch Super AMOLED HD that’s found on its predecessor, a Cortex-A9 dual-core processor running at 1.5GHz (compared to the Galaxy Nexus’s 1.2GHz CPU) and microSD support. As for Android version, we would expect it to run Jelly Bean out of the box. According to the EXIF data, two firmware versions have already been spotted, I9260XXALI5 and I9260XXALI6.

We’ll be back with more news about this new Nexus handset once we have it. Anyone excited?

JUNIOR EDITOR

Google+ E-mail

Chris Smith is a writer, a blogger and a freelancer. He started writing about gadgets as a hobby and before he knew it he was sharing his views on tech-related stuff with readers around the world. Whenever he's not writing about gadgets he miserably fails to stay away from them, although he desperately tries. But that's not necessarily a bad thing.

YOU MIGHT LIKE

galaxy-nexus-vs-nexus-4
Comments
  • cycad007

    Radiation isn’t the first metric most people will use (if at all)…but its nice to know that government agencies are testing/checking for this.

  • Calamity Sam

    Just learned something new today, thank you, where is this type of info usually found?

  • MasterMuffin

    I don’t think anyone considers that :)

    • Pit

      Wrong

      • MasterMuffin

        Correction: 99.9%.

  • Jusephe

    SAR levels for iPhone 5 are for 3G (in Europe ) and 4G (in US)
    SAR levels for samsung devices is for Wi-Fi
    iPhone 5 on Wi-Fi got from 0,07 to 0,13

    Wow incredible one thing where is iPhone 5 better ! Instead of fry your brain in 30 years it will take 45 if you have an iPhone ! It’s a killer feature !

    • kascollet

      Thanks for correcting this.
      SAR exposure measures are way more complicated than one single value.
      See :
      http://www.apple.com/legal/rfexposure/iphone5,1/en/

    • Pit

      This is not true. You need to compare apple to apple (no jokes here :-)). The number you see is usually the US one for the cell antenna. You don’t know what S4 has for wifi and I have my doubts that the iphone is better because as you say, they are killers machines!

  • NicholasMicallef

    Holy crap it destroys the iPhone… not that anyone cares bout this xD…

  • Free At Last

    Now I know why my iPhoney burnt a hole in my pocket.

  • yungqb7

    So the GS4 is safer and a better phone. Music to my ears lol

    • kascollet

      The article just said “safer”. Better is another land to conquer… tomorrow !

  • Alex Haua

    I’m one of the small percentage of the population that is sensitive to EMFs and cell phone radiation; I get a uniqe headache and even chest pain when exposed. Some people may feel like I’m being paranoid; however, I’ve been able to pick up significant EMF radiation when I had no knowledge that it was nearby…and it was then verified with meters. In either case, It’s been somewhat of a curse because it limits which smartphone I can use. The SAR rating alone can be misleading because of how it’s determined. In addition, cell phones are also putting out EMF radiation in addition to RF radiation. Also, the newer smartphones are extremely active in radiation emision because they’re sending and receiving so much data now. I tried the Samsung S 3 and was excited that Samsung was attempting to manufacture phones with lower SAR ratings. Unfortunately, I couldn’t keep the phone due to symptoms and I tried everything…even forcing it into 3 G mode. Kudos to Samsung for trying to make more human friendly phones though. I’m still stuck with my Blackberry Storm, which I can tolerate for some reason. I’m gonna give the S 4 a try….my search continues…

Would you like to view our mobile friendly site? Try it out