Time Warner Cable, like Verizon, pushes LTE as a replacement for fixed broadband

by: William Neilson JrMay 9, 2014

TimeWarnerCableVSComcast FreePress.net

Last week, we noted how Verizon was doing their best to convince New Jersey officials that their LTE service was just as good as broadband internet speeds on a fixed-line. Verizon was doing this because they wanted to get out of their contractual agreement with New Jersey to wire the entire state with broadband speeds of at least 45 Mbps. Even though New Jersey taxpayers have handed Verizon over $13 billion to wire the state, Verizon felt it wasn’t in their best financial position to honor their contract and instead decided to pass off their incredibly expensive, low data-capped wireless plans as an acceptable substitute.

Now, Comcast and Time Warner Cable want everyone to know that because LTE service exists in this country, the two companies should be allowed to merge due to the competition against those wireless providers. As the Huffington Post stated, “Time Warner Cable Makes Hilariously Absurd Argument For Comcast Merger.”

If allowed to merge, Comcast would therefore controls nearly 40 percent of the U.S. broadband market and provide cable to almost a third of American homes. But of course, Comcast and Time Warner Cable say that this is not anti-competitive and is in the public interest. Time Warner Cable CEO Robert Marcus One listed so-called competitors of Comcast and Time Warner Cable and put mobile networks high on the list:

“I would also note that mobile wireless is rapidly becoming a viable alternative to cable broadband given the ever-increasing capabilities of LTE as well as continued advances in compression technology,” Marcus said in a testimony in front of lawmakers on Thursday.

The notion that someone could use a wireless data plan as a replacement for a fixed-line broadband connection is laughable and completely unrealistic.

If a consumer wants to use a satellite internet service, they should prepare themselves for terribly-reviewed, slow and unreliable service that at its best will give connection speeds of up to 15-20 Mbps with small data caps. In many instances the new 10-15 Mbps plans are failing to deliver even 2 Mbps for many with some seeing dial-up speeds. 

Hughes Net Gen 4 Plans

study by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies reiterates that wireless is simply no substitute for fixed line service. The study found that 7% of Americans are “smartphone only” but 83% of smartphone owners have broadband at home.

As the Huffington Post notes:

“But let’s say you want to ditch your broadband provider and use a 4G hotspot to stream Netflix. The biggest wireless data plan you can get from AT&T is 50 gigabytes per month — enough to watch about 16 hours of Netflix in HD. That’s not much, considering the average U.S. household that’s connected to the Internet uses 102 gigabytes per month, according to Cisco’s Visual Networking Index. And that small data plan — which includes unlimited texting and voice calling — is going to cost you a whopping $375 per month. And if you’re one of the lucky ones with unlimited data? Sorry, but once you reach about 5 GB — roughly two hours of streaming Netflix in HD — some carriers slow your data.”

If the Comcast and Time Warner Cable merger is approved, Comcast will be the only option for high-speed Internet for 37 percent of US homes.

  • joemama

    This merger is simply not good for the consumer!

    • emma852

      My Uncle Michael
      recently got a stunning black Mercedes-Benz GL-Class GL63 AMG only from working
      part time off a home pc. navigate to this web-site F­i­s­c­a­l­P­o­s­t­.­ℂ­o­m

  • Based on the DOJ’s rejection of AT&T/T-Mobile, I can’t wrap my head around why the DOJ would let this go through.

  • Ali Mohamedali

    so first they give us ridiculously low data caps for our wireless phone plans, and say that power users (top 5%) are congesting the network for the rest of the users, but now they want to switch home internet service to LTE also? I’m on verizon wireless with 2 grandfathered plans, one for my phone, and one for a verizon 4g router (a real router, not a 4g hotspot), which cuts out once or twice a day sometimes, but otherwise its always on, and delivers me faster speeds thru LTE than my cable provider gives me for internet service (i have both). From my cable company i get 15Mbps down and just 5Mbps up, but from verizon LTE I usually get around rock solid 20Mbps down and 10-12Mbps up, even upto 30Mbps down speed some days. I really don’t know how bad it would really get once more and more people start using it as their dedicated internet.

    • smokebomb

      It would get unbearably slow. The spectrum just isn’t there to substantiate Comcast’s dumb claim.

  • Mark Cribb


    • smokebomb

      They are. Them and Comcast are trying to say the merger should happen because the market for hard line internet is being cut into by LTE which is a bold faced lie. NO wireless company in America is even close to blanketing the country in enough LTE infrastructure to make that claim true.

  • Scott Kay

    I’m sure Arlen Specter is pushing for the Comcast merger ;-) Funny how politicians are ones ‘deciding’ what is in the best interest of the consumer.