DOE to spend $120 million over 5 years to make batteries 5x bigger and 5x cheaper

December 3, 2012
34 20 2 3

    Image Credit: SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

    The United States Department of Energy has announced that they’re going to spend $120 million over the next 5 years to fund research into making batteries that hold 5x more energy than the ones that are out on the market today. They also intend make batteries that cost 5x cheaper. According to Computerworld, this new program will “reproduce development environments that were successfully used by Bell Laboratories in the World War II Manhattan Project that produced an atomic bomb.” Six national laboratories, five universities, and four private companies are going to get together to try and achieve these ambitious goals.

    So why now? We’d like to think it’s because smartphones are popular, but it’s more complicated than that. Improvements in battery technology have been practically nonexistent for the past few decades because no one wants to invest the time and energy into making gizmos last longer. When you reframe the problem by looking at energy sustainability and manufacturing ultra clean cars, then the discussion changes completely.

    Just imagine electric cars becoming mainstream because they’re finally cheaper? Or how about electric cars that can actually be used by industries that require vehicles that travel long distances? And think about soldiers who need to carry massive batteries to power their communications equipment, imagine making their load 5x lighter so they can carry either additional supplies or be more nimble?

    We welcome America’s investments in this field, and we hope something similar will happen in other countries. China in particular comes to mind. If they can create not just revolutionary battery technology, but then also figure out how to mass produce it, then they’re going to put themselves in the driver’s seat of the future of the electronics industry. And what about Europe? Don’t they have scientists too? Why isn’t this a global project?

    34 20 2



    • Wan

      Wow, a whole whopping 120 million over 5 years? Isn’t that sum almost patheticaly low? o.O

    • logical_thinker

      NOT 5x “bigger”. LOL. Poor title choice. How about “5x energy density” instead….

    • Nobbie

      I detest phrases like this from the ignorant and blinkered:

      « And what about Europe?
      Don’t they have scientists too? Why isn’t this a global
      project? »

      If you’d been to any of the international surface science of nanotech
      conferences around the world you’d have realised just how far behind the USA is
      in respect to this kind of research. By the way, if you hadn’t worked it out surface science and nanotech is where it’s at for battery technology. Hasn’t it ever crossed your mind that cars in Europe, are all faster, hold the road better and give 50 mpg. That’s called innovation, that’s what our science does for us Europeans, that’s why when fuel prices go through the roof we shrug our shoulders, as our car engines aren’t derived from a 1950s design. This is also why the international cooperation in fusion research is based in Europe (look up ITER), and have you heard of CERN? Maybe you should fire up Google and do some research.

      This is also why in Europe, we have what’s called a “brain drain”,
      simply put our best scientists go to America, because American doesn’t have
      enough of them and they’re not given enough money or enough credit where they

      So, where are the European scientists? They’re already delivering and probably closer to you than you think.